User talk:129.78.64.105

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 129.78.64.105, is registered to University of Sydney and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact University of Sydney to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

[edit] Please contribute constructively

Contents

[edit] 2005

[edit] August

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Alex.tan 09:06, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jeepien 19:07:42, 2005-08-25 (UTC)

[edit] 2006

[edit] August

  1. Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to United States national basketball team, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alf melmac 01:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  2. Thank you for experimenting with the page Pi on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Kevin_b_er 02:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to List of notable Riverview Old Ignatians, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 12:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  2. Your recent edit to Credit creation (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 06:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October

  1. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. T REXspeak 06:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  2. Thank you for experimenting with the page Karl Stefanovic on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November

  1. Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Unit 731. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikimachine 17:08, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Fritz Lang. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. JDtalk 02:45, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2007

[edit] March

  1. Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Library on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. John Vandenberg 00:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

  2. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Xdenizen 00:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Nicholas Shehadie, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Optakeover 02:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Naltrexone, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. the_undertow talk 01:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Kent and Dollar Farm massacres, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. snowolfD4( talk / @ ) 20:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pumped-storage hydroelectricity, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kbh3rdtalk 03:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Destructive cult. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MSGJ (talk) 23:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Salbutamol, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salbutamol was changed by 129.78.64.105 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-30T03:13:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reply to comment made on User talk:Hersfold in regards to User:PalaceGuard008

First off, I'm not going to unblock you because by coming here you're evading your block, which is not allowed. Using an IP address to get around a block on your account is considered abusive sockpuppetry and is in itself grounds for blocking. Further requests to be unblocked should be made by using the {{unblock}} template, on your talk page, while logged into the blocked account. This is partially so that other administrators, as yet uninvolved in the case, may have the chance to review the block and offer additional opinions on the case, but also to ensure that your block has its intended effect.
To address your actual reason for coming here, this edit, which I assume is the one you're referring to, is not a constructive complaint. Sarcasm, particularly when used in controversial situations, is not considered constructive or helpful. It's often very harmful and prevents useful discussion from taking place.
The fact that you're continuing to accuse other users in bad faith is also not helping your case at all. Looking at your block log, I see you've been blocked once previously for edit warring. While that was by the same administrator, I can't help but notice that User:Nishkid64 has never made a single edit to Gedhun Choekyi Nyima or its talk page. It is not uncommon for administrators to watchlist the talk page of users they have blocked in the past - page histories and user contributions are kept public for specifically that reason, so that any user may act as a check against any other user's possible violations of policy. You'll notice that WP:STALK specifically mentions that this is acceptable; it does not become "wikistalking" until the user monitoring your contributions makes an effort to undo your work specifically to harass you. In reviewing your contributions and Nishkid's, I don't see this as being the situation.
Now, again, using your IP address to edit while you are blocked is not permitted. I can see from your contributions that you've been using your IP to continue the dispute on Two Chinas, and for this reason have blocked it as well. (Note that I would not have blocked you had you only come to speak to me.) The block on your IP address will expire close to when the block on your account will. Any further requests to be unblocked should be made while logged in, on your account's talk page. Thank you for coming to clarify your reasoning to me, however I again suggest you read through our policies and guidelines and wait out your block. Hersfold (t/a/c) 13:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)