User talk:129.67.63.62

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your recent edit to Harry Kretchmer (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 07:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Harry Kretchmer page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dfrg.msc 07:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Pull that sort of stunt you did on Harry Kretchmer again and you will have your editing privileges revoked. Johnleemk | Talk 08:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

The correct procedure for requesting the deletion of such an article would be to use either {{prod}} or AfD. That Kretchmer has multiple (and some of them independent) reliable sources discussing him indicates that, at the very least, his (lack of) notability is not very clear. Speedy deletion is only for absolutely clearcut cases. Johnleemk | Talk 13:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Lancaster Royal Grammar School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- SuzanneKn 21:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gaius Asinius Pollio (consul 40 BC), you will be blocked from editing. Alexfusco5 21:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.