User talk:129.252.70.10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your recent edit to James J. Braddock was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Roman Polanski has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 15:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Roman Polanski constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 15:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Roman Polanski. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg⊕⊗ 16:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

All controversial or defaming information about a person must be cited. If you can not find a reference from a reliable source, the information cannot be included in the article. Thingg⊕⊗ 16:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rapist

...is considered NPOV when added to occupation titles. 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 16:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to User talk:21655, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CardinalDan (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.