User talk:129.234.4.1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This host, hamster.dur.ac.uk, is registered to University of Durham (UK) and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Clause IV, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --CWY2190TC 23:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. John Lake 23:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Cake constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages. If you wish to make useful contributions, read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 22:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page MATLAB on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.SMC 11:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Opinion poll page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. RazorICEtalk 09:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. -- Necrothesp 01:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:JiFish. Thank you. -- Hdt83 Chat 22:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ayds, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 22:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Reciprocal lattice, you will be blocked from editing. — PyTom 19:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Birkenshaw, West Yorkshire, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Shoessss 14:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 23:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

If you wish to contribute to this encyclopedia, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), editing by anonymous users from your school, library or institution's IP address may be currently disabled. You continue to have full access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address is probably also disabled.

If editing is required for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.

Thank you.

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gooch, you will be blocked from editing. Gromlakh (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Alexander's Swift, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Alexander's Swift was changed by 129.234.4.1 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-18T18:59:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

--Nlu (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "UoD is an insitution with 15,000 staff/students, and probably in excess of 25,000 registered IT users. The "vandalism logs" are nothing of the sort, in that most of the items listed are not examples of vandalism. In the past nine months only a few examples (<5) of actual vandalism, none of which are persistent, appear. I - and probably not I alone - shall never associate my registered name with my institution's IP address, as I wish to maintain as much anonymity as possible (I usually edit articles from home, but in this case a point of fact will go uncorrected as I cannot edit it from my desk). A year-long block for this institution (and, I expect, many others) is, frankly, the unnecessary result of thoughtless admin work. If there were any indication of persistant editing / reverting of specific articles then a block of, say, a week might be in order, but there is no pattern of vandalism : all edits appear isolated events. A 1-year block simply serves to save a few minutes of peoples' time reverting a handful of incidents of obvious vandalism, at the expense of losing what are shown to be (via the edit logs) significantly more cases of worthwhile contributions. 129.234.4.1 (talk) 15:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "You claim that in the past nine months, there are only a few examples of actual vandalism. This is disingenuous given that the address has been blocked for just short of eight of the past nine months. Additionally, you have no right to edit anonymously and given the long history of vandalism, we simply do not believe it is safe to unblock this address. — Yamla (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


Comment. (Another admin should rule on the unblock request, but I want to put my thoughts in.) You do not have a right to edit anonymously. In this case, the institution's inability to police itself makes the anonymous block necessary to protect the project from vandalism. You are not stopped from editing as a registered user. If you don't want to do it, that's your choice. --Nlu (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)