User talk:129.138.20.139

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Theory of Everything, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

this comment is hypocritical. Will someone please explain to me how this is not a constructive revision of the article? Does this not demystify the topic. The above comment is vandalism, not my contribution.

thank you for the concern, Archetype

Inserting nonsense that is repeatedly reverted and deleted by other editors is vandalism. There is a talk page for this article if you want to discuss article revisions, rather than doing so arbitrarily. You have been warned on this and the other anonymous addresses you are using at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. Tubezone 02:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you genuinely for your concern mr. Tubezone. I entreat you to take a closer look and would ask you to reevaluate your insinuation that this is nonsense. Furthermore, those who deleted and reverted the article did so without even reading it. And I did post to the talk page to which nobody has commented. I'm sure you will like to discuss with me once you have read the article and reevaluate your opinion of "nonsense." Thank you kindly again. -Archetype

ps. if you read the article to the bottom you will see it is not anonymous

[edit] Blocked

Please take your time and instead of writing do some reading and understand how wikipedia works. Please start from Wikipedia:Five pillars page. `'mikkanarxi 02:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the help. I will read what you have instructed of me. Sincerely, Archetype

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I urgently and with the greatest respect and honor beseech the wikipedia administrators to unblock my account as I have been unjustly blocked. I am being accused of being a vandal which I am not. I am an honest and intelligent human being who wishes to better wikipedia, and who always acts in good faith. However, I have experienced the reverse, that many wikipedia users single me out and claim that I am a vandal even though I am not. Despite them not acting in good faith I retain my good faith that they will eventually see that I am true and honest. I am asking that you undo my block so that I may continue to participate in wikipedia, with good faith, in conjunction with all wikipedians at large. Thank you for your deep consideration and for helping maintain this wonderful website which is well appreciated by many. Sincerely, Archetype"

Decline reason: "Sorry, but we don't accept original research per Wikipedia:No original research. So please start citing 3rd party sources as required by Wikipedia:Verifiability, or we'll continue blocking you from Wikipedia for disruptive editing. --  Netsnipe  ►  04:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1/0, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 1/0 was changed by 129.138.20.139 (c) (t) replacing content with useless junk on 2007-10-08T23:22:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 23:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1/0. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. *Cremepuff222* 23:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 1/0, you will be blocked from editing. Corvus cornix 23:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 1/0, you will be blocked from editing. Corvus cornix 23:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 3 weeks as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--JForget 23:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)