User talk:129.11.77.197

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is 129.11.77.197's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to 129.11.77.197.

School IP address Attention:

This host, proxy11.leeds.ac.uk, is registered to University of Leeds and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
RIPE WHOIS database information | User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create a account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~). – Chris53516 (Talk) 15:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

! Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — FireFox • T • 15:03, 14 February 2006

[edit] Amy Madison on Angel?

Plans had been made to have Amy as a reoccuring character in the Buffy spin-off Angel, but due to actress Elizabeth Anne Allen's unavailability, plans were abandoned and the character of Fred was created

Very interesting stuff, do you know of a source that would backup the use of this statement in the article? Where did you hear this? -- Buffyverse 14:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

[edit] Your edit to Frank Zappa

Your recent edit to Frank Zappa was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Nottingham

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Politepunk 14:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page George Foreman Grill on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Karafias Talk • Contributions 09:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Venn diagram. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Schutz 09:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 25-Oct-2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Stuart Fielden on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.Chris Kreider - HFF 15:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Saint Mary's Academy, Rawalpindi. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gzkn 12:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to University of Cambridge

Your recent edit to University of Cambridge (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Bwithh 20:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dutch cuisine

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Arnoutf 21:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Altrincham on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Rettetast 14:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Altrincham, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rettetast 14:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Altrincham, you will be blocked from editing. Rettetast 14:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

I was trying to move the "History" section in Persian language to be in line with Wikipedia:WikiProject_Languages/Template, but was blocked by User:Ahoerstemeier.

Closing {{helpme}}; please see instructions below. Thanks. —XhantarTalk 16:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was trying to move the "History" section in Persian language to be in line with Wikipedia:WikiProject_Languages/Template, but was blocked by User:Ahoerstemeier."

Decline reason: "In the future, please register an account to avoid being lumped in with the vandals operating from this address. -- Yamla 16:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

And please use the "edit summary", as your edits looked like a partial page blanking how can anyone guess you actually move around stuff. andy 16:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chi-square test, you will be blocked from editing. Poeloq 09:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Raven4x4x 09:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to Aereogramme and Dr Pepper, 31 July 2007

Please do not add unhelpful, non-constructive and unsourced information to Wikipedia as you did to Aereogramme and Dr Pepper. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --afromme 12:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Royal Coat of Arms of UK

Let's discuss this on the talk page. In the mean time, please give me a few minutes to clean up the double redirects. Lovelac7 12:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Southport has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 11:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Burton Fleming, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 12:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fifth Gear Vandalism

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Fifth Gear, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John Gibbard (talk) 17:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nokia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 14:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Corfu. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eve (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Didier Drogba has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. – Gurchzilla 16:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to The Troubles appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Traditional unionist (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. BigDunc (talk) 13:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.