User talk:129.11.76.230

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

• The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
• The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
• The ability to start new pages.
• The ability to rename pages.
• The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
• The ability to upload images.
• The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
• The eligibility to become an administrator.
• Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. The Neokid - Wikihalo Guiding Director talk 18:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Your edit to David Platt 2 Manowar 3 User talk:Veinor 4 Tissue engineering 5 Shah Jahan 6 Your disgusting comment's on Zoe's talk page. 7 Regarding edits made during February 28, 2007 (UTC) to Keresley 8 Your edits to Pool-in-Wharfedale 9 Holy Cross College UK Edits 10 August 2007 11 January 2008 12 February 2008 13 March 2008 14 May 2008

[edit] Your edit to David Platt

Your recent edit to David Platt (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Manowar

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 00:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Veinor

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 01:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Bodington Hall on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. amitch ^(talk) 14:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tissue engineering

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tissue engineering. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cquan 22:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shah Jahan

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Shah Jahan. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. STTW (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Kilt on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Chris 73 | Talk 22:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. -- Chris 73 | Talk 22:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your disgusting comment's on Zoe's talk page.

Thank you for trolling a good author and admin. Kicking people when they're down and upset is clearly the mark of people at the University of Leeds. Please keep your sanctimonious preaching to yourself. If she doesn't want to edit after the way she got treated, then the last thing that is helpful is your snide comments. BTW, get an account -- no one listens to random ip's with a history of vandalism. --Elaragirl^Talk|Count 10:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Is that attack based on this edit alone? If so, you are bang out of order Elaragirl. Please apologise. I'm not sticking up for the University of Leeds, mind ;-) Badgerpatrol 11:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I think the attacks on my edits have been pretty amazing - Wikipedia needs to decide what it's about - either IP addresses can edit or they cannot. If they can edit, then the edit needs to be taken on their merits. My remarks on Zoe's page have been taken as kicking her while she is down - I don't see it that way. Surely an administrator needs to be able to take and listen to honest remarks about conduct - it's not like I'm saying that Zoe is a terrible person or a terrible admin. As for "kicking her when she is down" - I really don't see that, people some times wish to hear honest feedback - but that's why it should be given. There is frankly not much reflective practice from everyone gathering in a circle-jerk saying "come back and let's forget about it!" - far more productive to say "come back and let's learn from this". I also like how Elaragirl talks about my posts being trolling and then slurs everyone at the University of Leeds - nice double standard there. There is a very very basic point at threat here - the right of IP addresses to comment (nobody says they have to listen) and the ability for ordinary wikipedians to be able to comment on events - trying to silence people is never the answer. And no I will not get a account - wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, if you don't like that, you need to change policy - not whine at people who are keeping within and acting with good faith. -129.11.76.230 15:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I am assuming that you have had no prior antagonism towards Zoe. If that is true- and I have no reason to believe that it isn't- then I agree with you 100%. It would be beneficial to you to get an account, but as you correctly state, you shouldn't have to if you don't want to. Elaragirl's attack was particularly uncalled for- for interest and amusement, an indication of the level of her intellectual capabilities and debating skills can be found here. Sadly the mark of a good Wikipedian lies in their ability to let these things wash over them, as we all must do from time to time. Your comment was perfectly valid and shouldn't have been removed nor should it have led to any fuss, ceteris paribus. Badgerpatrol 00:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during February 28, 2007 (UTC) to Keresley

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Erebus555 16:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Pool-in-Wharfedale

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Pool-in-Wharfedale. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BlueValour 15:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Holy Cross College UK Edits

You have recently been voted a "A God Amongst Men" and have just ascended to the rank of Chief Fluffer for future works in Paul Hand's extensive pornography career, good day to you fine gentleman. Hope to see you again on the Holy Cross wiki page innit? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ultravox3 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Gamut, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 09:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Astrophysics. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Someone else 90 (talk) 09:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mazhar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 11:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Your recent edit to Mondement-Montgivroux (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page 1975 European Cup Final do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LGrSVmRjoM) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 11:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to 1975 European Cup Final. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BT5mIHZau_k) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 12:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]