User talk:128.243.253.111

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 128.243.253.111, is registered to The University of Nottingham and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

 Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Middlesbrough F.C., did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Simmo676 19:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to James Cannon (rugby player), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James Cannon (rugby player) was changed by 128.243.253.111 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-11-20T12:13:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to James Cannon (rugby player), you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka Wimt) 15:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Willis, you will be blocked from editing. DavidJ710| talk 21:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Willis

You really call cleaning up vandalism? It looks more like introducing vandalism and unsourced defamation. I just removed this material in an effort to save the article from a speedy deletion for nonsense and defamation. I sincerely doubt that anyone died at the age of 172. As for the other material, I will review it for meeting WP:BLP. Please discuss any changes you wish to make on the talk page and be prepared to provide verifiable sources, especially for anything that would be controversial under WP:BLP. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 22:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Satori Son 17:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Willis

Once your block has expired, rather than re-introducing spurious material that violates various policies, you might present a "Keep" argument at the discussion-- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Willis. You need to read WP:BIO, WP:V, and WP:BLP before doing so. Please do not re-introduce unverifiable material. Please do not remove the AFD notice. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 18:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sweden has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 20:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Sweden constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 20:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC))

Hi, the recent edit you made to University of Nottingham Halls of Residence has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 00:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to University of Nottingham Halls of Residence constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Animum (talk) 00:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC))


Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pocahontas. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ➪HiDrNick! 15:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shami Chakrabarti, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. David Underdown (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


You have been blocked for a period of 2 days from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Satori Son 19:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "coz i hav rec0n"

Decline reason: "If I'm understanding you correctly, your argument is that you only received one warning today. That is true, however, this IP has been actively vandalizing over the last few days. The warning levels don't necessarily reset each day — Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] vandalism warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Willis, you will be blocked from editing. --AndrewHowse (talk) 14:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC) <<struck warning. good faith edit>> If the British one can be shown to be notable than we would need to rename the article with his entire name or with a descriptor in parenthesis after his name. Not that I think the current subject is any great shakes. Generally, when more than one subject has the same name, we create a new article instead of taking over the current article. Dlohcierekim Deleted? 15:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Willis, political scientist

The version recreated by The University of Nottingham based anon was essentially the same as the version deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Willis. I would not attempt to recreate this roughly 9 times deleted article without being able to provide verifiable sources asserting the subjects meeting WP:BIO. Dlohcierekim Deleted? 20:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michael Willis, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dlohcierekim Deleted? 17:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Michael Willis. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dlohcierekim Deleted? 17:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Eton College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 16:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Eton College constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 16:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC))

Hi, the recent edit you made to Asparagus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Húsönd 00:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to November 3

Dear 128.243.253.111,
Some of your edits on the page November 3 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)