User talk:128.243.220.42

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 128.243.220.42, is registered to University of Nottingham and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Edward 01:03, 2005 Jan 19 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FireFox 13:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Further vandalism originating from this address has been recorded on the oligopsony page. blocking may be indicated. Vicks007 19:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Whoever is responsible for this vandalism is a disgrace to the University of Nottingham. As someone who is using the Wiki via the University network, I apologise on behalf of the University for the behaviour of this rude, ignorant and cowardly idiot.

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Latinus 14:11, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Thank you!

Thanks for your valiant attempt to fix Quantum teleportation. It did not go unnoticed. You're quite right, the article is in terrible shape; if you have the time and energy to make it into something sensible, please do! If not, oh well. Cheers! :) --Ashenai 16:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for reverting, in pop-ups it looked like a blanking attack by an annon. --DV8 2XL 17:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prostitution Edit

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please do not put hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as the one I found on the article on Prostitution. If you continue to vandalize, you will be referred to the admins, who will take the necessary action to put an end to your disruptive actions. Roy Al Blue 14:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Harrow School. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --BinaryTed 16:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

More nonsense, this time in the aticles List of female porn stars and List of gay porn stars. One day block imposed. -- Karada 14:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] If you have disagreements...

If you have disagreements, please talk about them on the discussion pages. Also, remember the 3 revert rule. Thanks! Where (talk) 21:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Vimto was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 21:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Vimto, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Betacommand 21:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] May 15

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. IrishGuy 21:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Aleph-4 13:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Hedgehog

Your recent edit to Hedgehog was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

I think it's ok w/ current amount of references, kind of scary when it is longer than article. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Yanksox 15:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


Blocked for 3 hours

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism, for a period of 3 hours.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.
—Celestianpower háblame 21:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Robbie Jackson. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Sweetie Petie 21:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Earth

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. tmopkisn tlka 22:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sources

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Multiple sclerosis. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 12:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Scotland

Your recent edit to Scotland (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Rugby, Warwickshire. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Michaelas10 (Talk) 14:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. •CHILLDOUBT• 12:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 16, 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you blank a page, as you did to Methionine, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

As you received a final warning yesterday, you are now being reported to administration. Hersfold (talk|work) 21:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] February 2007

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fraunhofer diffraction. It is considered vandalism which, under Wikipedia guidelines, can lead to blocks being applied. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --TeckWizParlate Contribs@ 13:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is an shared IP address, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.

[edit] May 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page James Watt on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. utcursch | talk 17:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Ryan Giggs, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chensiyuan 14:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grey Court School, you will be blocked from editing. --Ytny (talk) 15:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Isothermal transformation:

Your recent edit to Isothermal transformation (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits (like "TEST" or example.jpg), vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 13:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 25 May

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the University of Nottingham Halls of Residence page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Stlemur 11:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Soren (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 01:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Dioxolane . Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ed (Edgar181) 14:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nelly Furtado videography

When an editor fixes problems in an article, please don't revert him or her. Non-free media such as music video screenshots aren't to be used unless they contribute significantly to the article (see WP:NFCC), and my other edits involved bringing the article into line with the Manual of Style and other relevant style policy and guideline pages. Extraordinary Machine 21:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sport. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Miranda 14:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to the Trollope surname article was reverted, as a large section of the article was deleted without explanation. Please see that articles talk page for a discussion of this. Swanny18 11:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Rafael Benítez, you will be blocked from editing. Stephenb (Talk) 11:27, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


[edit] December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Campuses of the University of Nottingham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —slakr\ talk / 08:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Stormtracker94, you will be blocked from editing. I (talk) 23:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. STORMTRACKER 94 22:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to University of Nottingham Halls of Residence, you will be blocked from editing. -mattbuck 11:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to University of Nottingham Halls of Residence has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to University of Nottingham Halls of Residence. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CounterFX (talk) 23:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Walker (Heartbeat 1994)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thomas Walker (Heartbeat 1994), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Thomas Walker (Heartbeat 1994). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Moral hazard, you will be blocked from editing. Calabraxthis (talk) 15:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to General relativity, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Quaeler (talk) 15:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Benito Mussolini has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma msg! 15:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 02:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Damien Plessis appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Ged UK (talk) 12:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This IP address recently contributed obvious vandalism to the Woolly Bugger article. Please refrain from doing so.--Mike Cline (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dyslexia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tnxman307 (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Tnxman307. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Quaeler (talk) 16:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.