User talk:128.187.0.164
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
[edit] Warnings
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]
[edit] April 2007
- Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Michael Johnson (athlete), are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] May 2007
- The recent edit you made to David Gerald Chesser constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Gurch 21:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Amatulic 23:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Greek language. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kimontalk 15:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- The recent edit you made to Oakland Raiders constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Gurchzilla 05:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 1983, you will be blocked from editing. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 16:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Active Directory, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 22:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] June 2007
- Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Joy Division, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Trusilver 23:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
[edit] Drawing board
Hello. I have responded to your post at the Drawing board. Cheers! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 03:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Humanitarian aid, you will be blocked from editing. Bart133 (t) (c) 18:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Etymology of Kenya?
I'm curious about your edit to the Kenya entry. It's always been my understanding that the word Kenya comes from the Gikuyu Kirinyagga-- the name of Mount Kenya. What's your source? --Buddhagazelle 03:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] August 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at The Woodlands High School. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. Trusilver 04:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
No, read Wikipedia:Notability - Is this event notable? I do not believe so. WhisperToMe 02:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
[edit] Camille Cleverly
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Cleverly. Thank you.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 01:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Removing speedy deletion templates
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Camille Cleverly, you will be blocked from editing. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 01:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC) (last warning)
[edit] September 2007
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Blue-collar worker, you will be blocked from editing. Rjd0060 00:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
[edit] Trinity
A number of your edits to the Trinity page appear to fail our policies regarding original research and presenting all views on any contended issue, without stating any of them as true. I would like to request that you read these policies before seeking to make further edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheologyJohn (talk • contribs) 19:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please desist making these edits to the Trinity page. They are breaking the rules of wikipedia, and may result in you being blocked if you continue to make them without justifying them as within the rules of wikipedia. TJ 19:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Image talk:Metabolism 790px partly labeled.png
A tag has been placed on Image talk:Metabolism 790px partly labeled.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g2.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. OsamaK 03:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] November 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Animal sexual behaviour. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [1] / edg ☺ ★ 21:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Central Valley High School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 21:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Rock music has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 17:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rock music. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. – Gurch 17:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Rock music. – Gurch 17:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] December 2007
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bean, you will be blocked from editing. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Thomas Mann has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Werdan7T @ 03:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Diabetes mellitus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 03:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC))
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mormonism. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 00:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Criticism of Mormonism. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 00:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Emmitt Smith has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Party! (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Bulimia nervosa has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ScarianCall me Pat 03:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AKKI
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article AKKI, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of AKKI. RogueNinjatalk 10:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Warren N. Dusenberry has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Veil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thingg⊕⊗ 15:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
Your recent edit to American Idol (season 7) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 06:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comics Articles for Deletion
One or more articles you’ve been involved in editing (Melter, Ringer (comics), Ego the Living Planet, or others) has been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 15:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 16:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
Your recent edit to Meryl Streep (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Schottky barrier do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 23:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to MOSFET. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 23:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |