Talk:126th Cavalry Regiment (United States)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] War on Terror

The War on Terror is a U.S. declared war. It's ridiculous to call it an international war.

A source also needs to be cited if the National Guard units truly are getting better equipment and training. There have been newspaper articles that suggest otherwise.

--OMouse (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rename

I propose that this article be renamed to 126th Cavalry Regiment (United States). The new name would reflect the current status of the unit, and all of the information currently in the article would be easily integrated into a History section of the article. --Zharmad (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Seems reasonable, but it should be under the official name of the unit. Has the name of the unit be changed or is it still called the 126th Infantry? --Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
The current official name is 1 Squadron, 126th Cavalry Regiment. The current commander is LTC Barrett, and the current CSM is CSM White. [1] Zharmad (talk) 20:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Then move it to that page and add in information about the CO and the CSM. Also, put that link down as a source. No point in having this information under the wrong name. Go for it! --Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Page moved, it still needs a little cleanup, which I plan on working on tomorrow night. Thanks for the input! Zharmad (talk) 22:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay. No Problem. :) --Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencingand appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. --dashiellx (talk) 11:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)