User talk:125.60.248.139

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled to prevent 125.60.248.139 (talk • contribs • block log ^auto) and other new users from making disruptive edits.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

This IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.

The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

I donot appreciate strange humorous warnings out of the blue for no reason on MY COMPUTER SCREEN whenever I visit WIKIPEDIA!! -- 125.60.248.139

1 Blocked without a valid explanation, just opinions
- 1.1 Copied over from Tiptoety's talk page
  - 1.1.1 User redirecting to IP page weirdness
- 1.2 April 2008, Please Stop
2 Threats of being "blocked"
- 2.1 Deviantart
  - 2.1.1 Comments on this talk page
  - 2.1.2 Comments from Imroy's talk page
3 Never been warned! =D
4 The Last Warning Ever?
- 4.1 Gogo Dogo
5 Knol

Blocked without a valid explanation, just opinions

Hi there, I am not sure it is the best idea to create a account with your IP address as you username and then redirect it here. Might just be better to use one or the other. Tiptoety ^talk 04:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Please explain why you think it is not the best idea and you're reason for giving me your opinion? -- 125.60.248.139

For one the username is a bit lengthy, which violates out username policy. Along with the fact that using multiple accounts is not looked very highly upon. Tiptoety ^talk 04:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Where in WP:USERNAME is "a bit lengthy" a violation? Thank you for your opinion, it has been noted. -- 125.69.247.138

Copied over from Tiptoety's talk page

User redirecting to IP page weirdness

This [1] seems very strange. A registered user is redirecting his pages to his IP address page. I came to you, since you were the one who made the last post there. Not sure if it's allowed, or makes sense, or anything, really. I just wanted to get an opinion on it. This guy seems determined to make a point. Redrocket (talk) 04:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I think my point here is clear and I haven't disrupted anything except maybe your investigation into the matter. You have my IP, you have the edit history. Glad I could help Wikipedia and you learn something new here. -- 125.69.247.138

You know, I was wondering the same thing myself. I have never seen this done before and as such am not sure what the precedent is, and do not know any policy that prohibits a user from doing that (99% sure there is not). My recommendation is to take it to WP:ANI to get better help. Sorry, wish I could be better help. Tiptoety ^talk 04:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Do you see it as abusive? You have my IP. -- 125,69,247,138

It just not a very good idea to use more than one account. Tiptoety ^talk 04:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Is this your opinion or are you going to actually provide help by citing policy? I only have one account, this one. The other isn't an account, its what happens when I dont login. -- 125.69.247.138

Well because it appears that the IP you are using is shared by multiple users you should not redirect your username there, also using an more than one account (IP or not) to help push a certain opinion or idea (not accusing you of doing so) is not allowed per WP:UN. Tiptoety ^talk 04:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok you're making assumptions. -- 125.69.247.138

Where should we discuss this so that it isn't spread over several user's talk pages? -- 125.69.247.138

April 2008, Please Stop

Please stop copying out-of-context conversations from my talk page, and pasting them onto yours. I have no idea what you're doing, but it seems to be very uncivil. If you wish to have a conversation with me do so, but please leave conversations alone that don't involve you. It's disrespectful to all parties involved. Redrocket (talk) 05:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Would it be more civil if I didnt point out your uncivil behavior? Your comment is public, it can be posted anywhere. -- 125.60.248.139

Threats of being "blocked"

Deviantart

Comments on this talk page

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to DeviantArt, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Imroy (talk) 04:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not revert edits while displaying your lack of investigation into the matters. -- 125.60.248.139

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to DeviantArt, you will be blocked from editing. --Imroy (talk) 05:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Again, you obviously haven't looked at the edits in question and the corresponding edit summaries. -- 125.60.248.139

Really? You're claiming I'm reverting edits without looking at them? What a load of nonsense. --Imroy (talk) 05:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Then why are you ignoring my explanation? The nonsense is also on your part. -- 125.60.248.139

Imroy, you are uncivil and acting as though you are higher than me. That is humour! -- 125.60.248.139

Comments from Imroy's talk page

Please do not revert edits simply because you didn't review my changes and edit summary. -- 125.60.248.139

Imroy, "Two years later" is unneccessary. And the symbols used are no longer used. It is irrelevant. Your reverts are unfounded. Your threat to block me is uncivil. -- 125.60.248.139

And you edit summmary in reverting my edit "rv poorly explained removal of content by troll" is a personal attack. --125.60.248.139

Symbols before usernames are most definitely used on deviantART, so that section stays. Your recent edits have been very belligerent and, IMNSHO, quite troll-like. Calling you a troll is not a personal attack - all I know about you is the edits you have performed. And they all look like someone trying to cause trouble. That's a troll to me. --Imroy (talk) 05:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, enough of all this silliness. I see my mistake in thinking that all the symbols were no longer in use. The article said some symbols are no longer in use and I misread it that all symbols were no long in use. You didn't have to be so rude about it. -- 125.60.248.139

Calling me a troll is a personal attack and uncivil. You don't even know who I am! Not that it matters, but it is very rude to call people trolls just because there is a disagreement. -- 125.60.248.139

By the way, you removed content provided by another user.[2] You provided no explanation and did not discuss that content AT ALL! Goodbye! -- 125.60.248.139

Never been warned! =D

First Warning = Last Warning ?

Someone said that was my last warning? :D -- 125.60.248.139

"This is your last warning." —Preceding unsigned comment added 02:37, 25 September 2007 by 68.219.147.214 (talk • contribs)

Pffft. You got banned,[3] not me. -- 125.60.248.139

I was about to warn this user, but just couldn't, since they already received a last warning. There can be no warning after last warning, I'm a witness to that. 82.80.85.38 (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

WHAT? What's the accusation this time? --125.60.248.139

Trigger Happy Wikipedia users

Note, that in almost every dispute involving this IP address, the other user also was also making "mistakes". However, more important in every case was that I am bad and must be punished and banned. In these people's minds, my interest in pursuing such problems makes me a "troll", never mind that my interest shows that I care about Wikipedia enough to take on these disputes. - 125.60.248.139

User:Imroy: "rv poorly explained removal of content by troll"[4] Note that this edit summary went along with an edit where Imroy accidentally removed content by another user. -- 125.60.248.139

Dont worry, its only wikipedia.... —Preceding unsigned comment added 21:43, 28 February 2008 by 216.249.59.239 (talk • contribs)

Yes, but they take it so seriously meanwhile the entire project is an unreliable source trying to position itself as the ultimate source. -- 125.60.248.139

Here's an example of the typical Wikipedia "vandal fighter":

"Sorry about this. At least I only changed two.. to my knowlege. I'm kind of currently absorbed in vandal fighting." — User:Daedalus969[5]

Lack of faith

"Please [note] he has left this same exact message with about 6 users so far. Looks like a possible vandal/spam account. Be careful." — User:Tiptoety[6]

Live Bots ?

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:63.162.143.21 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO ^Hail! 13:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Your use of a cookie-cutter message about "unconstructive" does not make sense considering the talk page in question. -- 125.60.248.139

The Last Warning Ever?

"Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked." - Jimbo Wales' Pedia

"None of that sounds like a reason to unblock at this time." – Luna Santin (talk) 10:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Gogo Dogo

Gogo Dogo Gadget Go Punite! You've been added to the list. -- 125.60.248.139

Knol

Kickstart Wikipedia rehab by supporting Knol. -- 125.60.248.139

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--barneca (talk) 05:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

If an unblock is requested, this may be somewhat confusing to the reviewing admin. For background, see this discussion: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User redirecting to IP page weirdness and Special:Contributions/Onetwentyfive-60-twofortyeight-onethirtynine. You won't be able to make heads or tails of this archived talk page, because the IP has a habit of rearranging the material on their talk, and posting large chunks of text written by others here. --barneca (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not use yoru talkpage to continue to be disruptive. You are currently blocked, as noted above. If you wish to have this block reviewed, you may request an unblock as described above, however other uses of this talk page may be viewed as disruptive, and may result in this page being protected for the duration of the block. Good day. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]

Categories: Semi-protected user and user talk pages