User talk:125.255.16.233

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] John Brignell

I have reverted your edits due to no edit summary. As such I can only assume this is vandolism. Essexmutant 13:27, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article John Brignell. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mboverload 05:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rory096(block) 15:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I have made a bold edit, which the policy on vandalism clearly states is not vandalism. The reason for this is that the article as it stood clearly breaches multiple wikipedia guidelines and cannot be salvaged. Others have reverted my edit, I have reverted back. Provided I do not revert more than three times in 24 hours this is perfectly acceptable behaviour under wikipedia's guidelines. Engjs 21:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I have blocked you for 24 hours. Please refrain from edit warring, as you have on John Brignell. Use the talk page to discuss any problems you have with the page. Pepsidrinka 01:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)