User talk:125.209.176.44

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edit to Jimbo Wales rapes babies!

Your recent edit to Jimbo Wales rapes babies! was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 11:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Furthermore in your zeal to remove the (completely innocuous) image tag you also removed the very tag ({{db-vand}})) which I placed on the page to ensure that the page be deleted as soon as possible. You thus ensured that a page with an offensive title hung around, with or without an image, for longer than it would have had you not de-tagged it. Please do not remove speedy delete tags in such circumstances. By the way the page has now been deleted and its creator warned. Tonywalton |Talk 11:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Could I suggest that if, as you say yourself, you don't " have an encyclopaedic knowledge of wikipedia's esoteric language", you go a bit carefully when deleting stuff, then. As for the bot you may or may not hear from Tawkerbot, who is not me. Tonywalton |Talk 12:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk page edits

Do not change other peoples comments, as you did on Talk:Convention on the Rights of the Child[1]. That can be classed as vandalism especially when the meaning of the comments has been changed. MartinRe 11:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Apologies, just noticed this appears to be a few days old, so probably doesn't apply to you :) MartinRe 12:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Ejaculation

Wikipedia is indeed a censor-free environment, but nevertheless certain boundaries must be set. If you wish to include that image in the article, then instead of placing it at the head of the page, create a link to the image with an alert of its explicitness. Images like that are okay, but they must be used with respect for those who may be offended. Thank you.--SomeStranger (T | C) 03:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)