User talk:124.181.65.132

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson

Please don't add notices to people's talkpages that they clearly don't want. It's really up to Jeffrey whether he would like such a notice... WjBscribe 01:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

This account has been blocked as a sock puppet of User:124.181.26.71, an account that was blocked for the same sort of editing abuses. Jehochman Talk 02:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "One month is way too long. Please change the length of this block. All I am really doing is persuading Jeffrey to use his admin account, because he will need that account for admin purposes."


Decline reason: "That's his choice. Not yours. You call it "persuading"; I might call it harassmentDaniel Case (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

A protective block can remain in place as long as necessary to protect against the abuse. Jehochman Talk 02:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I am not being abusive! 124.181.65.132 (talk) 02:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Your contributions speak for themselves. Another administrator will be along soon to decide whether you should be unblocked or not. If you are unblocked now or later, do not resume the harassment or you will be blocked again. I suggest you forget about User:Jeffrey O. Gustavson. Otherwise, choose an appropriate form of dispute resolution to address your concerns. Taunting another user is not acceptable. Jehochman Talk 02:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Please shorten this block. A month is too strong for what you think I did."


Decline reason: "I might have otherwise shortened your block. But in the face of this edit, request to unblock denied. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.