User talk:124.181.233.170

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi there, I've tried to communicate with you a couple of times here, and on the discussion page. Have you read my comments on the discussion page today?

I have as much right to continually remove information, as you do to tell me not to.

Also, as a matter of course - the 'good article' rating is suspect. A majority of the articles sources no longer even point to valid web addresses. The article quotes humourous TISM answers to serious questions, which is ridiculous. The article should be about TISM, not an attempt to repeat TISM's silly answers and therefore be 'funny'.

And, as bares repeating, it should NOT include information on the real tism, because:

An Encylcopedia article should provide basic understanding of any given topic. To know, or want to know, or provide, TISM's personal info, is to COMPLETELY, utterly, and wholly, mis-understand TISM. Therefore, any article including this information has 100% failed in its purpose of providing an understanding of TISM. Penny lopez (talk) 10:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

All of that was brought up on the TISM talk page long before. The consensus was, if it is verifyable information then it should go in the article. It is verifyable. and ps: the Good Artical nomination was on the current (or very recent) version of the article. 124.181.233.170 (talk) 20:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)