User talk:124.180.116.122

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Please either unblock me, shorten this block, or make this block anon-only. I have an account I can edit with. The BLock was abusive and put in place by an administrator who never makes blocks anon-only. All I did to "deserve" this block was put in an AIV report, nothing wrong with that! And just because the report is bad faith doesn't mean the reporter should be blocked! And there is some stuff I need to participate in. Oh, and that edit summary of Santin's removal of that report...Sockpuppet? Of whom?"

Decline reason: "The fact that you have an account isn't too convincing: your edits have been entirely disruptive or made in bad faith. Abuse of process is a valid reason for blocking. As you continue to make accusations against users, you will not be unblocked (and p.s. - here's Luna's activity log, with several anon-only blocks. ;-)) — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "But I did nothing wrong! A block is a stupid idea when somoene has put in just one bad-faith report. A block for four or five reports, maybe, but NEVER for just one report! A block is much more stupid than a warning! It's much more sensible to warn people to stop making such reports than block them...so please unblock or shorten or anon-onlify. I can't take this anymore. THIS BLOCK IS ABUSIVE!!! I put in ONE bad faith report. JUST ONE. This is not grounds for a block! Especially one that isn't anon-only! And one that isn't something like 6 hours! And yeah...who did this Santin think I was a sockpuppet of?"

Decline reason: "The block wasn't just for the report you made, it was also for your disruptive editing. The report was sort of "the last straw", so to speak. Declined, as I see no reason that the original block was invalid and no reason to unblock either. Regards, Spebi (talk) 05:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.