User talk:124.176.209.38

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] April 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. seicer | talk | contribs 00:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "a"


Decline reason: "This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
  • Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
  • Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
  • When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Good edits."


Decline reason: "You can't grant yourself a second chance. - auburnpilot talk 15:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Why don't you give me one then?"


Decline reason: "Read (and follow) the instructions given to you two templates up, and we might consider it. However, if you're going to continue posting nonsense reasons in these templates, we're going to protect your page and make you sit out the block. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Article text removed to clear categories and amboxes - see history for details

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "By "the instructions two templates above", do you mean the 2nd chance instructions? Well good, because I have made constructive edits to no less than FOUR articles."


Decline reason: "All you did was copy the text here. There is no difference whatsoever between the text you copied here and the text of the source articles. You've just forfeited your opportunity for a second chance with your dishonesty. -Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Wrong. See the articles and the copies of those articles I pasted here. You will see that there are some differences in them. Okay, if you don't notice the differences, here they are: James Kisina - Removed unnecessary bits, one of which was confusing, since it did not precisely say who was sentenced. Mario Party 6 - Changed full stop to comma, capitalised a word. Elizabeth Israel - Since her age is disputed, I added question marks. Alvin and the Chipmunks - Removed the plot summary, since it was long, crufty, and had lots of errors."


Decline reason: "Abuse of the unblock tag, page protected. — Sandstein (talk) 07:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

{{helpme|Please tell User:Hersfold that I really did make changes to those articles.}}

The unblock template was quite sufficient to get my attention. When we give you the second chance thing, we're looking for more than simple grammatical corrections. Ok, so you did that with Alvin, but you removed half of the article, which is more vandalism. Plot summaries can be useful, and are encouraged provided they don't get in too much detail. You haven't demonstrated that you are able and willing to make contributions that are good enough to merit you being unblocked early - come back in two weeks. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)