User talk:124.176.160.139

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 124.176.160.139, is registered to Telstra Internet, Australia. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Telstra Internet, Australia to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Telstra Internet, Australia, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Schapelle Corby page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Longhair\talk 12:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Schapelle Corby, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Schapelle Corby was changed by 124.176.160.139 (u) (t) deleting 43031 characters on 2008-03-15T12:43:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Schapelle Corby. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. EJF (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Longhair\talk 12:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

(edit conflict) This account has been disabled for a while due to attempts to harass other users and repeated, egregious vandalism. Jehochman Talk 12:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "My "vandalism" to Schapelle Corby is actually my opinion of what should happen to Corby. She really should be given the death penalty."

Decline reason: "Your edits were disruptive to our goal of writing an encyclopedia, irrespective of your views on capital punishment. — Addhoc (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Two weeks is too long. Please make it something like 36 hours."

Decline reason: "Your previous request indicates that you are planning to make similar edits when your block expires. If that is the case, then two weeks is far too short; if you do continue editing inappropriately, you can expect the next block to be an indefinite one. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

That would probably depend on what you plan to do, if unblocked. Do you understand that a repeat of prior problematic behavior would promptly lead to reblocking? – Luna Santin (talk) 08:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I oppose any early unblock. If this were not an IP, the block would have been indefinite. Jehochman Talk 13:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "An unblock is only fair now."

Decline reason: "Per above declines — Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

{unblock|I need to unblocked. Now! And I never said I was "planning to make similar edits".}