User talk:123.2.124.42

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by DavidYork71.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Usage: {{unblock-auto reviewed|ip_address|autoblock_message|blocking admin|decline=reason}}
Note: If the "decline=" is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

  • Blocking admin: not provided.

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page.

Sarah 14:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Vandalism falsely claimed despite contributions evidence being available and demonstrating much the contrary - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/123.2.124.42"


Decline reason: "The contributions of this IP are not a proof that a user, who was logged in and using this IP, was not performing edits that are disruptive (see also the contributions of your account Special:Contributions/Categorist7, which were made when you were editing, presumably from this computer, they are not logged in the contributions of this IP). I am afraid you will have to provide us with evidence that you are not the same as the user who was using this account (user: DavidYork71, who was banned for sockpuppetry, disruptive editing). --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "From the above I see rather strange requests for accountholders to prove that they are !not! someone else, and I can't see either where there has been vandalism in the contribution history link which can be blamed on any users of the network at this end. On those grounds, thankfully whoever reads this may concur and unblock."


Decline reason: "Sorry, all our good faith attempts to understand what was happening behind this IP have been met with tries to abuse our volunteers. If you are DavidYork, you know the appeal procedure. If you are not, well, I apologize for the inconvenience this user has caused you, but we can't unfortunately unblock you. Rest assured that your ability to read our encyclopedia is not impacted. — -- lucasbfr talk 09:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "some wrong categories on entertainment articles"


Decline reason: "Per previous denials — ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively.
This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.

In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.

Comments: Please don't unblock without asking a checkuser - Alison 08:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)