User talk:12.34.246.37

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] XPW article

No I'm not the author of it although I have the XPW page on my watchlist and I read DOI sometimes. I think the fact that a lot of big name wrestlers are involved makes it notable enough to include. There is a rule somewhere on Wikipedia where you're allowed to have one fan site for a particular wrestler/promotion so even if it's not categorized as a source (which I think it can be) it could be categorized as a fansite and since there aren't any other fansites it should work.BooyakaDell 20:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not vandalism!

I am sorry that it called it vandalism. I will go mroe careful in the future. I use a utility that makes reversions of mistakes and any other edits that need to be taken back to a previous version much easier. It automatically labels it as vandalism and i apolagize that it did! Your contributions are much appreciated. Please feel free to continue to contribute. If you have any other questions or concerns, I will be glad to help you with them! Just let me know. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Danvers

DANVERS is a small good town with simple people, stop by today!

How true. But where you placed it, it was vandalism. Please desist. Unschool 03:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] April 2006

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page AOL Instant Messenger have been removed. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. Note that Wikipedia may see print or DVD publication, so we want more content, not more web links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — nathanrdotcom (TCW) 04:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. — nathanrdotcom (TCW) 04:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Standing Room Only (album), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Standing Room Only (album) was changed by 12.34.246.37 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-17T19:46:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 19:46, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

  1. Hi, the recent edit you made to BaD Radio Show has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dadude3320 19:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

  1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Liberty Island. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)