User talk:12.216.169.187

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Soybean (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 08:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Anderson Cooper has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dadude3320 21:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Thetan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. –Cheers, LAX 21:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Anderson Cooper. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Dadude3320 21:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Thetan. Dadude3320 21:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GBT/C 21:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I'VE BEEN FRAMED!"

Decline reason: "Actually, you were warned several times for vandalism, and then added an attack comment to the Sandbox. Please take the week of your block time to review Wikipedias policies on attack posts and vandalism. — SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 21:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I've been banned for criticizing Jimbo Wales. Take that, free speech!"

Decline reason: "You weren't banned, you are blocked. Your block has nothing to do with Jimbo and everything to do with your vandalism. — IrishGuy talk 22:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Stop abusing the unblock template. IrishGuy talk 22:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Fine. Page protected. IrishGuy talk 22:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC)