User talk:12.145.108.11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I moved your content in with the other parents and made it a separate category - - if you see the heading that was made is clear. The heading was made bolder so as to bring strength to the section on parents. That was when your content stood alone. Now it has been joined by another parent and I would agree it looks terrific with it.

I did not put it under a criticism category as you would like to have it appear. The redesigned headline was specifically removed from the criticism section for a new broader section on parents.

So actually I did read your content. That you have moved it to the other section makes sense as well, but in MHO it was more distant in placement from the other parents who oppose your position when your content stood alone.

But your placement is just as logical. The point here is that no riduculousness was intended, your content was read, and the movement sought to strengthen the visibility of your content.

I trust you will understand that no disrespect to your contribution was in any way intended. Kyle Andrew Brown 20:33, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Jonathunder 21:10, 2005 August 21 (UTC)

[edit] "You" and "your"

Note that 12.145.108.11 is the IP address of a law firm, not an individual, so the edits from this address are the product of more than one person. 207.38.168.98 22:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)