Talk:103 Colmore Row

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

Architecture WikiProject (Rated stub-Class) Architecture Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten. Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. WikiProject England England Portal This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. West Midlands WikiProject (Rated start-Class) This article is within the scope of the West Midlands WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the West Midlands. In so doing it works and collaborates with the two related projects UK Geography WikiProject and UK Subdivisions WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page. Start This page has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Skyscrapers (Rated start-Class) Architecture Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to skyscrapers, high-rises and towers. To participate, visit the project page for more information. Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Proposed deletion

This building is one of the most prominent on Birmingham's skyline, so I think the article should remain. However, I do agree that it could do with some more content. JRawle (Talk) 14:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree, this is a major part of the skyline. It is difficult to find information however. It is not exactly internationally renowned so finding links which are not adverts is very difficult. Believe me, whenever I find information on any of the articles I have created, I add it to them as soon as possible. - Erebus555 15:21, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, if it's prominent, at least say so. At present, the article itself gives no reason to suppose that the building deserves an article (which is why I prodded it). --ColinFine 19:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Redevelopment.

I have found an article on Property Week that says this building is to be acquired by British Land for £21 million. The problem is that if I put this information in the article, a reference will be needed and Property Week is a subscription based service. What should I do? - Erebus555 19:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

There's nothing in Verifiability that says the sources have to be free. I would add the information with a reference (WP:CITE) and a note that this is a subscription service. You might also reference the paper copy (if there is one) on the grounds that, at least in the UK, people are likely to be able to consult it in a public library. --ColinFine 20:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)