User talk:-Midorihana-/Archive 4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Battle at Emmaus
I finished the first paragraph after the headline "Battle at Emmaus," and added the section headline "Battle at Emmaus." You can change it and add a cleanup thingy. :(
--Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 00:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Battle of Rome, 390 BC
I want to create this article on the Battle of Rome in 390 BC. What do you think? Of course, I have a few reliable sources.
--Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 00:47--Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 00:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC), 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Check to make sure that there isn't an article about it already under a different name, or there isn't a subsection about the same thing. Midorihana~いいですね? 07:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- I did. There was nothing about the Battle of Rome in 390 BC. There was really no record of the Battle between King Brennus and Camilius.
-
- --Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 07:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Alright, that should be fine. Also check Wikipedia:Notability, although being a history article I'm not too sure what it would fall under. I'll have to ask. Midorihana~いいですね? 07:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- It's very notable, I can assure you. It was one of the main contributing reasons why the Roman Legions were developed. It was the predecessor of Marius' legionaries. It practically put Rome's military top dog in Italy. Go Romans! --Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 23:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I'll work on it. It might take a while, considering no one has really written anything. But I'll try. It'll probably by pretty bad. But I'll try. I would love so say my favorite quote here, but it might be offensive. I'll just Anagram it. GWI!!! --Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 23:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benedict of Constantinople (talk • contribs)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Sounds good. By the way, also check WP:TALK (just FYI). You should try to make a personal sandbox, too. Midorihana~いいですね? 23:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- There is a Battle of Rome. But it's called the Battle of the Allia. I'll just edit that, because it is a bit short for such a decisive battle!--Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 00:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- That's why it's important to check. :) Midorihana~いいですね? 00:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
History notablity (?) question
What does history fall under in the notablity guideline? I'm not too sure that it applies. Midorihana~いいですね? 07:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Though we don't have any specific guidelines for it, I'd say that if it has been covered/researched extensively it would be notable. However, you may want to check with the people at WikiProject History; I'll look around as soon as I get back home from school. Oh, and thanks for the barnstar! :) Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 13:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- You're welcome! It seems like the notablity guidelines only deal with the recent. Midorihana~いいですね? 20:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- If I may jump in, history falls under the general criterion at WP:N. I would imagine that pretty well anything that happened in 380 BC would either be notable or would have insufficient information to write an article about it, so I'd say go for it. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 22:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification :) Midorihana~いいですね? 22:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- If I may jump in, history falls under the general criterion at WP:N. I would imagine that pretty well anything that happened in 380 BC would either be notable or would have insufficient information to write an article about it, so I'd say go for it. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 22:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome! It seems like the notablity guidelines only deal with the recent. Midorihana~いいですね? 20:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
History is good. --Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 23:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
about 216.56.27.19...
Hello!
I have two questions:
- Some time ago, I spotted some damaging edits that seemed to constitute vandalism here done by 216.56.27.19. When I reached his talk page here, I was stunned by the list of vandalism warnings that were issued to him, to no avail. This chronic vandalism seems to be intractable (I would in fact go a step further to imply that he is proud of his desctructive edits). Is there a way to stop vandals such as 216.56.27.19 for good?
- This is of rather less importance: I would like to send out user warnings to vandals as administators can. As an average Wikipedian, am I authorized to issue user warnings?
Thank you for your consideration. --~~MusicalConnoisseur~~ Got Classical? 04:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- It seems that that IP does have a history of vandalism; however, (as noted here), admins usually don't block IPs indefinitely because IPs can belong to a wide array of editors and affect many people.
- Yes, anyone can (and should) issue warnings to other editors when they vandalize (like here). Template messages for warning can be found at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. The templates have 'levels'; if the editor vandalized once, then place a level one template; if the editor vandalized twice, place a level two template etc. If the editor vandalizes after you issue a warning from the fourth level, then the next step would be to report them to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.
- If you have any more questions or anything, just leave a message on my talk page. :) Happy editing, Midorihana~いいですね? 07:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC) P.S. I'm not an admin, by the way :)
uploading image for Chocola
Hey Midorihana! I want to place an image or a few of them on the Chocola entry page/s. I uploaded an image of an ancient stone drain thinking I would then be able to position it on the page as I wanted. Can't figure out how to do it! Please advise. It is my own photograph from my project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Kaplan1938 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
MoP
What happened to Master of Puppets? Basketball110 20:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm his adoptee and we usually communicate once or twice a day, but I haven't heard from him for three days. I asked him a few things on the 17th and 18th, but never got a reply. Basketball110 21:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Basketball110 22:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping out Basketball110; I feel guilty for abandoning him for three days. Anyway, sorry if I neglected you, too. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 22:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's no problem :) Midorihana~いいですね? 03:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- And thanks for the comment on Wikidude's barnstar. I feel loved. ^_^ Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 22:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. :) Midorihana~いいですね? 02:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- And thanks for the comment on Wikidude's barnstar. I feel loved. ^_^ Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 22:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's no problem :) Midorihana~いいですね? 03:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping out Basketball110; I feel guilty for abandoning him for three days. Anyway, sorry if I neglected you, too. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 22:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Basketball110 22:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
Thanks!
Thank you so much for answering all my questions - and then some!
~~MusicalConnoisseur~~ Got Classical? has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
~~MusicalConnoisseur~~ Got Classical? 21:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thx
Thanks for your support, my request for adminship passed 60/0/0 yesterday!
I want to thank Mrs.EasterBunny and Royalbroil for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. To paraphrase a president ... I wish my mum and dad could see the comments made. My dad would be so proud to see the comments ... and my mum would have believed them". I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and you may be surprised to find that I have not deleted all of the pages by accident..... yet). Thanks again, Victuallers (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
---|
i proposed Defining moment for deletion
-Rich Peterson130.86.14.66 (talk) 19:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thank-spam
WikiProject Germany Invitation
|
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 22:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notification. Midorihana~いいですね? 04:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/01/24/episode-40-wikipedias-genetic-makeup/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 05:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
- Cool :) Midorihana~いいですね? 06:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Changing the article name
Hey, sorry for not answering fast. I think I'll recover from my holidays and be back to my full editing capacity in about a week. So anyway, I think it's a good idea to change the article name. I had thought about it, but I don;t recall why I didn't bring it up. On another topic, I fixed my sig! XD. --Slartibartfast1992 23:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
An Encore from the Connoisseur
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Here's one last thank you for being so polite and helpful with the answers to my questions! --~~MusicalConnoisseur~~ Got Classical? 06:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
I thought a barnstar would be better than a smile anyway... :D --~~MusicalConnoisseur~~ Got Classical? 06:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) Midorihana~いいですね? 08:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks (MoP did almost everything)! You have a nice page yourself. Basketballoneten 15:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hey -Midorihana- I just wanted to thank you for your kind words and support at my RFA. I was taken back by the amount of support I received. Well if you ever need any help or a question, feel free to come an ask me. Thanks again for your support!
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 18:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
My RFA
Thanks! | ||
-Midorihana-/Archive 4, thank you for showing your support in my RFA which passed with 38 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral! I also want to give special thanks to my Admin Coach and nominator, Useight for all of his help and support. I promise that I'll give my best effort as an admin, and I hope that your confidence in me proves to be justified. If I can ever be of any help, please let me know. In the mean time, I have some cleaning to do. Have a great day! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
a thank you note
Thanks for participating in my RfA! | ||
Although it failed 43/27/0, I'm happy because the outcome has been very helpful in many meaningful ways. Your support and remarks contributed so much to this. If you followed my RfA you know what happened. Most of the editors who posted opposing opinions have never edited with me. Some articles I edit deal with controversial topics and with respect to a very few of these, editors who didn't know much about me had some worries about confrontational editing and civility. Since I support their high standards I can easily (and will gladly) address this. The support and ecouragement to run again soon has been wonderful, thanks again. Cheers! Gwen Gale (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
RE: Template
Hey there! I'd suggest changing the title to "For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology". Also, adding a header to the section with people might be a good idea; title it 'founders' or such. Finally, might I suggest a background colour change? It makes it hard to see the v d e and show buttons. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 06:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Another user informed me of that and I can't figure out what the problem is... meh. I'll look more tomorrow, must sleep now. Anyway, glad to help and good night! Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 07:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Looks great! And you don't need to thank me, I'm just glad I can help you out. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 05:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh well, thanks for thinking of me! :) Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 23:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Looks great! And you don't need to thank me, I'm just glad I can help you out. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 05:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Some minor trouble
Hey, I've been meaning to make a section in What Is Your Dangerous Idea? about how the book was made, but I can't think of a good title for the section. "Making" sounds too ordinary but "synthesis" is downright nerdy. Any ideas? --Slartibartfast1992 22:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nick gave me the word "development". I think I'll start the section tomorrow. --Slartibartfast1992 02:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Sounds fine. :) Midorihana~いいですね? 05:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- It looks just fine, except for a bit of funny wording. There really isn't much to say about the development, hm... I hope I can dig up some sources. Midorihana~iidesune? 06:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Much better this time LOL :) Midorihana~iidesune? 06:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
My RfA |
||
Thank you very much for your support in my RfA which I really appreciate. It closed at 83/0/0. I was surprised by the unanimity and will do my best to live up to the new role. All the best, --ROGER DAVIES talk 16:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/02/04/episode-41-setting-the-record-straight/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 23:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.