Talk:École nationale supérieure de l'aéronautique et de l'espace
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
École nationale supérieure de l'aéronautique et de l'espace has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
[edit] Mikhail Gurevich as an alumnus of the school
On the alumni register (available online here [1]), two people named Samuel and Meyer Gourevitch (French spelling of Gurevich) are indeed listed as having graduated in 1913. However, there is no Mikhail or other close name in the list. It is relatively well documented that Mikhail Gurevitch spent some time in France around that period of time, but he was in Montpellier, not in Paris, where Supaero was at that time. Until someone finds a reputable source, preferably a book instead of weblink, I think it is best not to put Mikhail Gurevich in the famous alumni list. Flambe 20:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC) (was not logged at the time of the edit on the main page but was behind IP 86.220.194.222)
- The name of Samuel Gourevitch, founder of MIG, is mentioned on the schools printed alumni listing. However, as it is not available, except on the website you mentioned, here are another links which mention the fact that he was a Supaero alumni : [2] [3]. The article was written by Claude Carlier, an historian (specialized in aeronautics history) who wrote a biography about Marcel Dassault [4] [5]. See also here, here, and here. He continued his education in Montpellier University, France and then specialized in aeronautical engineering in École Nationale Supérieure de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace. So I think it is safe to put it back in the article. Hervegirod 14:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your interest in that question. I would however like to point out that, as I understand it, the co-founder of MiG was called Mikhail, not Samuel or Meyer, and this can be seen in most sources, including here, here, or simply the Wikipedia article on Mikhail Gurevich itself. As far as I know, Claude Charlier is the only person who mentions a couple of Gurevich brothers as the co-founders of the MiG company, even if it wouldn't be absurd that Mikhail/Samuel/Meyer would have spent some time in Paris if they already came to Montpellier. Besides, I am afraid that links [6], and [7] come from copies of old versions of the SUPAERO article on Wikipedia; they cannot really be used in this debate, can they? I was unable to check this link though. All in all, I think something more precise should be required here. Kind regards, Flambe 02:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I removed the refs that were mirrored from wikipedia, and added a {{Fact}} tag. However, there is at least one source different from Carlier or Wikipedia which cites Gurevitch as having studied in SUPAERO ([8] is the website of a French Jewish magazine, but the link goes on an off...). Hervegirod 13:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know if it is relevant, but there is an old MIG15 on the Supaero campus grounds. Some say that it was offered by Gurevich but I could not find any sources.
- OK, I removed the refs that were mirrored from wikipedia, and added a {{Fact}} tag. However, there is at least one source different from Carlier or Wikipedia which cites Gurevitch as having studied in SUPAERO ([8] is the website of a French Jewish magazine, but the link goes on an off...). Hervegirod 13:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your interest in that question. I would however like to point out that, as I understand it, the co-founder of MiG was called Mikhail, not Samuel or Meyer, and this can be seen in most sources, including here, here, or simply the Wikipedia article on Mikhail Gurevich itself. As far as I know, Claude Charlier is the only person who mentions a couple of Gurevich brothers as the co-founders of the MiG company, even if it wouldn't be absurd that Mikhail/Samuel/Meyer would have spent some time in Paris if they already came to Montpellier. Besides, I am afraid that links [6], and [7] come from copies of old versions of the SUPAERO article on Wikipedia; they cannot really be used in this debate, can they? I was unable to check this link though. All in all, I think something more precise should be required here. Kind regards, Flambe 02:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Supaero entrance.jpg
Image:Supaero entrance.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
