User talk:!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Wikipedia:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~.

Be Bold!

[[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade Wants you to vote!]] 12:02, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)-

[edit] Hello

if you have any questions feel free to ask me --Family Guy 03:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Man!

Awesome name, dude! Flip Merav 21 00:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Yah, its pretty awesome. Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 20:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I know your secret

Prince, is that you? --Chapium 02:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wow!

First edit in six months, and you say hello to me? To what do I owe the honor? :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 23:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question

according to your recent contributions, you have come to believe that i am someone else - a marytrott? i am not this person nor do i understand the accusation.

above edit is directed towards radiokirk

also... why am i blocked?

{{unblock reviewed|i have been wrongly accused|inappropriate username [[User:Naconkantari|<font color="red">Nacon</font><font color="gray">'''kantari'''</font>]] 00:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)}}

This edit—something you've never said to anyone else—recalls this, this and this. Your introduction out of nowhere recalled this edit (among others) as well. Your unblock request and denial of sockpuppetry recall this (previously noted), this and this. The evidence is convincing.
If you still believe you're being wrongly accused, send an e-mail to radiokirk(at)fastmail(dot)fm. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 00:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
aight,true that, but look at everything i did and contributed before my hiatus. this vandal you keep referencing is nothing like me. so i said the word 'chief'. yea it opened a few doors but with as many users as there are on wikipedia, you have to assume there will be many coincidental circumstances. what happened to the assumption of good faith?
The assumption of good faith is something in which I believe very strongly, unless there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary—which, in my strong view, was the case here. Again, feel free to send me an e-mail if you wish me to do further investigation. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 00:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

yeah sure, i hope this one is not deleted like the last one.. User:notadormattandapig —Preceding comment was added at 07:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)