User talk:Zimbardo Cookie Experiment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Zimbardo Cookie Experiment, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --AAA! (AAAA) 00:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Your username
I just saw your username come up on my watchlist, and I wanted to congratulate you on having the most original username I've seen. Here's a WikiCookie for your userpage. Happy editing! --Slowking Man 01:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's very kind of you. Thank you for the welcome. Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 07:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- That is a creative username. Welcome to wikipedia. Bawolff 07:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- damn, i came here to congratulate you on your username and see that a bunch of people have beaten me to it already! -- frymaster 17:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- If I'd known it would generate so much goodwill, I would have wasted some of it vandalizing pages! Thanks to everybody. Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 18:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh trust me, the vandals with good names don't get very much good will (whilly on wheels is a cool name). Bawolff 01:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- If I'd known it would generate so much goodwill, I would have wasted some of it vandalizing pages! Thanks to everybody. Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 18:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Your user page
I would recommend doing a user page to tell us more about you. This is completely your disicion, but I think of it fun, and helpful to have a userpage. Magistrand My Talk 14:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you for the interest. Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 14:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reverting vandalism
Yes, you're correct that reverting vandalism like on the Bradbury article is not subject to 3RR. You seemed a little unsure in your edit summary. Don't worry, you can revert "MATT IS A FAG" from any article as often as necessary. Thanks for cleaning that up. —Chowbok ☠ 18:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I appreciate the reassurance! Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 18:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Eliot Tokar
I honestly wouldn't have thought any of them were fake until you said lol. Maybe I am naive. They certainly are a wierd lot. He is probably not noteable really.Merkinsmum 20:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Would you like to report that they are suspected puppets? I wouldn't mind their muppetry, but they are quite aggro too.Merkinsmum 00:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 'ludicrously faux english stig'
http://whois.arin.net Search results for: 65.188.192.230c Comment: Allocations for this OrgID serve Road Runner residential customers out of the Columbus, OH, Herndon, VA and Raleigh, NC RDCs. (I don't have a technical enough mind to know if this is conclusive.)Merkinsmum 01:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Actually he writes that he lives in the states now I think, so we can't prove anything:)Merkinsmum 01:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Let's 'ave a cup of cha in his honour, me old china! If only Desi was as fun:)Merkinsmum 01:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Naw, me employers VPN routes out of Fairfax, VA so that's misleading. Instead I offer a little something from the old Savoy.
I, humble, poor, and lowly born
The meanest in the port division
The butt of epauletted scorn
The mark of quarter-deck derision
Have dared to raise my wormy eyes
Above the dust to which you'd mould me
In manhood's glorious pride to rise
I am an Englishman, behold me!
He is an Englishman!
He is an Englishman!
For he himself has said it,
And it's greatly to his credit,
That he is an Englishman!
For he might have been a Roosian,
A French, or Turk, or Proosian,
Or perhaps Itali-an!
Or perhaps Itali-an!
But in spite of all temptations
To belong to other nations,
He remains an Englishman!
He remains an Englishman!
Cherio! Stig --65.188.192.230 22:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Another one. User:Bensachs - came on sounding authoritative, but no previous edits:)Merkinsmum 23:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- User:ElinorD I know from Gillian McKeith so I asked her to take a look but the nasty tone of Desi put her off I think. I know what you mean lol, they don't inspire one to work with them. P.S. I just looked up the cookie experiment- lol classic:)Merkinsmum 01:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Another one. User:Bensachs - came on sounding authoritative, but no previous edits:)Merkinsmum 23:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- You asked a good question about page size. We regularly run a bot which examines talk page size overrun times number of occurences and compares it to article page size and divides by number of days article has been in existence. The higher the value the greater the likelyhood that an article is in crisis and needs examination by our team. We always operate under new identities to protect our editorial indepence and impartiality. --Bensachs 03:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Zim-Who do you think is the 'we' referred to above?:)Merkinsmum 03:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- You asked a good question about page size. We regularly run a bot which examines talk page size overrun times number of occurences and compares it to article page size and divides by number of days article has been in existence. The higher the value the greater the likelyhood that an article is in crisis and needs examination by our team. We always operate under new identities to protect our editorial indepence and impartiality. --Bensachs 03:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- They are barking! We needn't contribute to the talk page now, 'They' are talking to themselves:) Merkinsmum 20:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Mitt Romney foolishness
Great call on deleting the change sourced from satire on an op-ed page peddled as if it were fact. You're right, poorly sourced facts on biography don't have a three-revert limit: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material. This is not the first attempt like this on one of the Mitt Romney pages. I've seen now three anonymous-IP editors find a humourous article or editorial and then try it out as cited fact on Wikipedia just for fun. -- Yellowdesk 04:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- I appreciate the vote of confidence. It was a mildly amusing story, but it's hard to understand people taking it seriously. Oh well; saved by WP:CITE. Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 07:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry
Holla, sorry for blankin your page bro i was just angry that my world soccer daily contributions kept on getting deleted. But i thought in wikipedia ur allow to write facts without sources such as according to Steve and Nick The 2gs backstabbed them. Yes i know the rest was wack but cameron the robot is a racist mf and i take offence cause his offending my people
Anyways bro, soz once again and peace out,
Ur homie Jamaal
PS. Holla back at me once u've read this, take care