User talk:Zgyorfi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi, welcome. Nice work on Computed tomography. // paroxysm (n) 22:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Belgium_flag_medium.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Belgium_flag_medium.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Michelangelo zgyorfi.jpg
 |
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Michelangelo zgyorfi.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.96.38 12:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Michelangelo zgyorfi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Michelangelo zgyorfi.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.96.38 12:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: CT
Zgyorfi, I saw your comments at Talk:Computed tomography#Removing my beautiful art / the author's response and I see that you had some confusion over some Wikipedia policies. The quality of the image or whether or not we like your art isn't really relevant. I know you said that you cannot accept the lack of references as reason for the section's removal but that is Wikipedia's policy, and you must accept it if you wish to contribute here. Put simply, one should not insert his own ideas, commentary, theories, and so on into Wikipedia. Rather, we should report on information published elsewhere. If there are other sources which discuss CT's role in art, or you can find published works of art, then these may be included. But if they're just your own ideas, then they don't belong in Wikipedia until they become notable enough for other sources to discuss them. Ideally, everything in Wikipedia should be well-referenced. Does this help? — Knowledge Seeker দ 01:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Flames
In the talk page for the article on the speed of light you added a section on "shame" and then had some very negative things to say about me.
I think you do not need to start a fight about my math ability or comprehension. You have written angrily and contemptuously. I wonder why that approach is appealing to you. You tell me what I want. Actually, what you should be interested in is what the article tries to compute and explain.
I do not think we need to deal in accusations of my presumed shameful incapacity to do mathematics. It is generally unhelpful on the Wikipedia to get into emotional confrontations, and a good way to get into such confrontations is to use emotionally loaded words.
You started out changing the equation, one that is found in standard textbooks, by changing the plus signs to minus signs, implying I guess that the author had copied it incorrectly. Maybe you thought that the physics textbooks had it wrong? That seems unlikely. I restored the equation and explained in the discussion page that the equation is context-sensitive. An article on the speed of light is not the place to go into a long explanation of how the equation has to be understood correctly and applied appropriately, but I have added a brief note to at least clue the reader in to the fact that the citation form of the formula given above in the text will not work unless the signs are adjusted to fit the circumstances. P0M 14:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
