Talk:Zelda Classic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zelda Classic article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Kirby Super Star Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

Contents 1 Revisions Sorely Needed 2 Article 3 license 4 "on good terms with nintendo"

[edit] Revisions Sorely Needed

The article has information related to the origins and development of Zelda Classic, but is sorely in need of an update to make it better suited to Wikipedia's quality standards. For one, I would suggest that the Major Contributors section either be removed or somehow integrated into the main article. Secondly, the External links section is starting to resemble a link farm. I move that it should be cut down a bit. Does anyone have opinions/objections? If no one is against these suggestions I will proceed to edit the article. Neutralparty 08:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article

I Don't think this article has no place being in Wikipedia, as aim's to advertise more than just give information. Also I don't think this article has any neutral point of view, and some parts I believe it's actually lie (like "good terms with Nintendo). Also I think everything in this article (true or false) is useless information. It's my believe that this article should be deleted. Sorry if my english makes no sense :-) --81.175.155.193 14:40, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Its A well known Zelda clone, its not advertizing at all, I have used it plus it has a large forum and numarerus fan sites about it. 208.192.71.106 00:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Since someone objected, I think that the deletion sign should be deleted - Chektt —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.126.173.111 (talk • contribs).

[edit] license

What kind of license does this game adopt? also is it an open source game? --Witchinghour 14:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

it's not open source. i dont know exacly what the license is 208.103.185.44 02:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

It's freeware. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.226.132.9 (talk • contribs).

[edit] "on good terms with nintendo"

i'd like to see a citation for the statement that the zelda classic team is on "good terms" with the company nintendo208.103.185.44 02:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

As far as I know, it is on NO terms with Nintendo, if you take my meaning.

I'd guess that if they weren't on good terms, they'd have gotten a cease-and-desist order from Nintendo by now. More than likely, Nintendo either doesn't know about it or just doesn't care.