User talk:Zeichman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Zeichman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Princess Tiswas 21:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My revert
Your reference to Wisdom made me nervous, and your edits seemed to reflect a bias, I essentially reverted to draw attention to the edits that to me seemed dubious, feel free to redo your edits, as they weren't less sourced than the previous material, I will certainly not revert you again. But don't add "Wisdom" with capital 'W' without explaining what it is. --Merzul 02:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Your new phrasing is much clearer, thanks. --Merzul 03:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Although I still can't quite follow the argument, could you comment on the talk page? --Merzul 03:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your article on Earl Doherty
Hello! I read your article after it was publicised on the Thoughts on Antiquity blog. I had the Earl Doherty article on my watchlist from when I was making some edits to Jesus as myth, so when I saw that Senori had added a link to the article, I made the description slightly more precise. One problem I realised while editing Jesus as myth is that theories like Doherty's seem to have received little scholarly attention despite attracting significant popular interest, so it was good to see an appraisal of his ideas from someone familiar with NT scholarship. EALacey 08:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bros/Bro's
Zeichman, you're probably right. Panda Bear most likely intended for the apostrophe to be there, so WP should reflect the artist's decision, considering it's not a hugely egregious grammatical error (it could mean "belonging to bro" or something). Evan Reyes 10:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
