User talk:Zedla
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Quebec City
I'm not especially interested in this article but I've reverted your edit because it seemed to delete parts of the article without any reasoning. Further discussion on Talk:Quebec City please. NielsF 02:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, I might have overlooked something, my fault (by the way I've reverted your edit to my userpage, but I've read it anyway). Cheers, NielsF 03:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] did you send me a message
krakcrook== mcroning050045 09:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC) oh sorry i am so sorry i thought i was editing my name my appoligies me answer back when you are ready yours sincerlymcroning050045 09:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] my edit to Asperger's Syndrome
I understand that you removed my edit to Asperger's Syndrome likely because I admitted that it was something I have personally observed... was the content inapporpriate or deterimental to the article or was it just that I admitted on the edit summary that it was only my own observations? I personally felt I added more insight to sarcasm and Asperger's Syndrome as I have personally experienced it, and seen others struggle with it more than I have. Electricbassguy 09:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why warn me about vanalism?
You say I vandalised the Sandbox? Try not to be stupid please.
Electrohead 21:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fact revert
Hey there. I think what happened was you bagged the vandalism just before I did - we both reverted, but yours was just slightly ahead; I went on to give the IP a test4, so what happened was the software recognized us both making the same edits, and the first one in was the one that was recorded. So no harm done. =) Tony Fox (arf!) 16:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Balboa High School Wikipedia Page
I am a student at Balboa High School in San Francisco. I noticed that you were responsible for a lot of the revisions for the page. I'd just like to suggest some information that we could add to the page. For example, we can add a comprehensive list of the clubs, organizations, and elective classes that we provide at Balboa. In addition, a listing of the AP and honors classes that we provide would be great as well. I'd also like to suggest that we work on noting specific achievements regarding the school, especially in light of the JROTC and mock trial teams winning many competitions in San Francisco allowing the school to garner a greater notice. I think we can work on this so that our wikipedia page adaquately reflects our school's achievement and rigor that it provides. Quixotic Rick 02:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mock Trial Section
There have been two IPs in particular that have been constantly editing the mock trial section of the Balboa High School article. You are a much more Wikipedia-fluent contributor than I so I seek your help. The IPs have been added to the discussion page for the website. I have reverted their edits and made it as neutral as I possibly can. I seek your advice on what I should do next; thanks. Quixotic Rick 00:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Filipinos
You need to stop removing sources such as the quote from Heherson Alvarez and accusing people of vandalism because they speak a truth that you do not want to accept. Apparently, the cultural issue does not matter to you, but it does not change the fact that there is a controversy over the name, and that the term Filipinos for Filipino people have been around longer than the snack and it's only fair that Filipinos leads to a disambiguation page. Accusing me of vandalism further shows your inconsideracy about the topic and your desire to start conflict. I'm not going to get into a flame war with you, but if you continue to remove sources, I will start a Request for Comment on your conduct.--Folksong 08:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Consider this your last warning regarding personal attacks and falsely accusing others of vandalism.--Folksong 08:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've already given you my reason. The term Filipinos for Filipino people have been around longer than the snack and it's only fair that Filipinos leads to a disambiguation page. What's your reply? --Folksong 08:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I also need to inform you that you are misquoting Wikipedia rules, because you did not start the article on Filipinos, in fact, you took the disambiguation page which covered both topics and turned it into that of the snack. Instead of falsely accusing me of breaking Wikipedia rules, why not start an RFC if you feel so strongly that I have?--Folksong 08:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've already given you my reason. The term Filipinos for Filipino people have been around longer than the snack and it's only fair that Filipinos leads to a disambiguation page. What's your reply? --Folksong 08:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Discuss on Talk:Filipinos for a compromise/agreement which is where this controversy should (have been) handled. Zedla 09:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Remember that this was originally a disambiguation page, which you decided should exclusively focus on the snack. In all fairness, I'm willing to stand aside and abide by the decisions of other users who weren't involved in actively editing the article. Regards.Folksong 09:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ohsp sharks.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ohsp sharks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lowell High School
If you look at the history of the changes relating to Margaret Cho, you'll find that first someone mentioned she had gone to SOTA, then someone else changed it to say she had gone to McAteer. I was attempting to forestall further argument by noting that SOTA was in fact located at McAteer during the years she was in high school. The link to the SOTA SARC was to verify that, as it noted that the year SOTA became a separate school was 1992. Please spend more time examining an article's history before deciding to change or remove content that seems "unnecessary" to you. -- CWesling 02:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Okay, fair enough. I just got tired of people changing it back and forth and tried to settle it for good. I don't think removing the reference to SOTA altogether would be best, because I feel there needs to be some indication that she didn't actually graduate from Lowell (to avoid confusion as to why she appears as a "notable alumnus" for two different high schools). -- CWesling 02:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
