User talk:Zawersh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome to the Wikipedia
Welcome, newcomer!
Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:
- First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
- When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
- Remember to use a neutral point of view!
- If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.
You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.
Best of luck, and have fun!
ClockworkSoul 14:35, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Bible citation
Thanks for the excellent work on re-pointing those links. I will continue adding the abbreviation redirects and will correct any affected by your change. Peter Hitchmough 07:59, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Disambiguation
Note — the linking method used for, e.g. Amos, needs attention. It might be best if the page Amos were the disambiguation page, and all links to Amos meaning Book of Amos were fixed. This can be done gradually over time. That would be the current use of disambiguation on the site. Peter Hitchmough
- Looks good (splitting Amos into (prophet and book). Of course, if you split you need to look at its What links here [[Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Amos]] and edit the links. However I think there needs to be the following pages:
- Amos — for disambiguation, replaces the current disamb. page.
- Amos_(prophet)
- Book_of_Amos
Anyway, thanks for discussing. Be bold, be wise. Peter. 08:30, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism inquiry
Hey, Zawersh, I was just wondering, I noticed that you corrected some vandalism on a page that I originally created and that I watch (historical thinking). How did you find this vandalism? It was a couple of characters appended onto the last reference on the page... I'm just curious to know how I can catch stuff like that. Andicat 2:40, 6 Feb 2005
[edit] Copyright Question
Fortune 1000 seems to be largely a data dump from [1]. I read over the various articles about copyright violations, but couldn't figure out whether it would be a violation to reproduce the full-scale data from a magazine like is done on that page. I tried finding a place where I could ask for someone to check on it, but it seems that the only way to do it is to blank the page and put up the copyvio notice, and I wasn't sure that that was appropriate since I really have no idea if it's a copyvio or not. I also tried figuring out where to ask more generally and finally got frustrated and decided to use the helpme tag -- sorry!! How should I approach this article/situation? Thank you! -- Zawersh 00:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure of a policy to handle it either, but taking it to the talk page is certianly the right next step. In fact it stumped a series of helpers hiding on #wikipedia-bootcamp. I think the question that should be asked there is exactly what you have asked above. Random brainstorm ideas; ask the magazine, ignore the issue and use it till they complain or read the magazines copyright. Sorry that i have no 'pat' anser, but you've done the usuall things I would do to anwser the question! -- ∞Dbroadwell 01:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Heh, I'm glad it wasn't just me being stumped on it. :) Thanks for the help, I think I figured out a tolerable solution to the situation now. Cheers! -- Zawersh 02:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] confidence interval
Your proposed confidence interval using z-scores was far too wide unless the sample size is 1. A 90% confidence interval for the mean of a normal distribution should contain nowhere near 90% of the data (in fact, in some cases, it should contain none of the data). Besides, you're not taking into account uncertainty that comes from estimation of the variance--that's what Student's t-distribution accomplishes. Michael Hardy 01:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiproject Computer science
Hi! I noticed that you have just signed on as a participant in WikiProject Computer science, and wanted to welcome you aboard. Please stop by the project talk page to see what issues are currently being discussed by other project participants, and give your input. --Allan McInnes (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome! I look forward to contributing to the project. -- Zawersh 00:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] welcome to WikiProject Programming languages
I look forward to working with you. Ideogram 02:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Likewise! I'm glad to see the project revived. – Zawersh 04:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stub sorting Barnstar
Greetings. There is a Barnstar for stub-sorting up for proposal here. If you'd like to participate in the discussion, we'd much appreciate it. Thanks, and have a great days. :) SynergeticMaggot 18:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)