Click to show archived discussions

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 4 topics 17 topics (partial) TBA

I usually archive by month or when this talk page exceeds 40 KB. If you wish to revitalize an archived discussion, please copy and paste all text, formatting included, to the bottom of this page.

[edit] nominator support?

This is really none of my business and I don't want to bother you, but I wondered why, as the nominator, you wouldn't support Philip Gronowski's RfA? I suppose you simply forgot? —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletions

Done =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Anti-Vandalism

Thanks, zero! I'm fighting vandalism using Vandal Fighter -- so that I will not vandalized again. Jigs41793 ^Talk/_contribs 01:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

For this :-) Max ^{- You were saying?} 06:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Santa's Little Helper

You reverted a good faith edit, which I have reverted back. Please review your edits more carefully in the future. Thank you. --Edokter (Talk) 11:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Qxz

I reverted your changes to Qxz's user page. While I'm sure that it was meant to be taken as a helpful gesture, the addition of a large, dramatic "RETIRED" slogan should be left to the user page owner's discretion. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 00:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tails0600

This RfA was withdrawn two days ago. I've removed your oppose opinion since once an RfA has been withdrawn it should not be added to. Thanks, Gwernol 01:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Not necessarily. As long as a withdrawn RfA is no longer transcluded on WP:RFA it is not active. A formal close does not have to occur. Generally people only add their opinions to RfAs that they find by looking at the RFA page, so this isn't a problem. Gwernol 01:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)