Talk:YTCracker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Hip hop, an ongoing effort to improve articles related to hip hop culture and hip hop music. The goal of the project is to bring this article, along with all others to featured status. If you have any questions, concerns or wish to participate you can visit the main project page here. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This page was previously nominated for deletion.
Please see prior discussions before considering re-nomination:
|
what sources, etc. are needed for verification and which items require verification? the talk page on the VFD has a ton of proof on it.
YTCracker made this whole darn article. Look at the history it was first made by "Rmk", and rmk is the name under which http://ytcracker.com wordpress posts are made. I'm not saying its not article worthy and should be VFDed, only that little of it is reliable (but such is the problem of wikipedia) 18.248.5.98 05:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes this activity is generally frowned upon, however the article has 18 separate references from major news sources. I think that those references prove a majority of the article content is reliable. In order to remove the "needs better sources tag", each statement should be properly cited. --Mattarata 07:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- no, rmk isnt me, and i didnt write the article, he did as an interested third party. rmk currently co-admins my bbs and also assists me with my new site. there are plenty of fans that write articles about people - rmk did this on his own volition. Ytcracker 08:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
You can have all the articles you want. You've contributed nothing colorful to the world, and since the majority of all edits on this page are from you or your friends, I personally feel it should be marked for deletion. CerpinTaxt 15:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spamtec?
Should spamtec have their own article? I mean, if yt has one I don't see why not.
- someone else would have to write it hahahahah Ytcracker 09:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- most of the information on spamtec resides in this article, it would be tough to make a full one about it. Aerno 06:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
http://www.myspace.com/nelly - Listen to "Grillz", at ~2:45 ytcracker kicks in... Wtf?
- which is exactly why it beggars belief that this article was nominated for deletion twice. YTCracker is by far one of the best Nerdcore artists at the moment, and Nerdcore got a lot of press recently. The mind boggles why wikipedia has hundreds of pages detailling every pokemon's abilities, a 6yo children cartoon, yet pages like this one get deleted on a whim. For example the page of the Futuristic Sex Robotz, (http://www.futuristicsexrobotz.com/) has now been deleted yet the band is well known in the Nerdcore world. 82.43.161.8 18:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- yeah but ytcracker isn't actually on the song, hahah--70.132.18.121 07:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Because this is notable... 24.77.160.119 02:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Anyone ever find out what his problem is with mc chris? --Delegado zero 22:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
