User talk:Yourockmywalrus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Hykiem Coney
A tag has been placed on Hykiem Coney, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --ArmadilloFromHell 00:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The emo ghost
A tag has been placed on The emo ghost, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:The emo ghost. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SUBWAYguy 06:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
My apologies for deleting the page a little fast. See my explanation at Talk:The emo ghost; I've also put a copy of the article there if you want it. -- SCZenz 06:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The emo ghost, again
A tag has been placed on The emo ghost, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted in a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how The emo ghost is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:The emo ghost saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. SUBWAYguy 21:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
The article was updated and changed from the initial posting
[edit] AfD Nomination: Pendant Productions
An editor has nominated the article Pendant Productions for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pendant Productions. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Pendant Productions during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 18:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pendant Productions re-animated!
I've got Wikipedia to release the Pendant productions article onto my Talk space so that it can be rehabilitated. Sport, it's your article so I would really like you to work with me on this. I believe the best track to take is to take a step back and make the article more general and then, when more references for notability can be mustered to support an independant article, release it into the wild veldts of Wikipedia to fend for itself! if you want to have a look at the exchange that gained the repreave it is here. I look forward to hearing from you. Cheers. --Kirok of L'Stok 04:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
