Talk:Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
 |
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is part of WikiProject Youngstown, which is building a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Youngstown, Ohio metropolitan area and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Organized Labour, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Organized Labour. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. |
| If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. |
[edit] Prior history?
In the following exerpt: "When the Court asked if the government took the position that "when the sovereign people adopted the Constitution, . . . it limited the powers of the Congress and limited the powers of the judiciary, but it did not limit the powers of the Executive", he assured Judge Pine that it did. He was, however, unable to name any cases that had held that the Court had this power."
It seems to me from the text that the last clause should read "...unable to name any cases that had held that the Executive [or President] had this power." Is this an error? --agr 22:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You're right
My mistake. Thanks. I'll fix it along the lines you suggest. --Italo Svevo
