User talk:Yfjonas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hoi Ping Chamber of Commerce Secondary School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Hoi Ping Chamber of Commerce Secondary School. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you!
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Hoi Ping Chamber of Commerce Secondary School may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects.
A serious message - PLEASE READ
Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Such posting can cause offence or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches. If you have posted such information, please remove it immediately. Please then follow the link to this page and inform people there that the information was posted (but crucially, do not repost it on that page). An admin or developer can then remove the information from the archives of Wikipedia.
If you do not ensure that personal information you posted is removed from this site you may be blocked from editing this site. REMEMBER: Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you.
Aranherunar 14:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Personal information
Adding personal information, such as names and contact info of other users and unwilling non-users, is perhaps the quickest way you can get blocked infinitely on Wikipedia. Take care. Aranherunar 02:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chinese chars
Do not change simplified characters to traditional as you did in Quotations From Chairman Mao Zedong. This is a PRC-related article and simplified is appropriate. CRCulver 15:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Simplified and traditional Chinese
I beg thee take into consideration of the 1.4 billion mainlanders though they may not access Wikipedia as freely. See this. Please do not change simplified Chinese hastily into traditional, especially in an article directly related to the person who propagandized the use of simplified Chinese. It would be same as going to the Chinese Wikipedia and translating the article about the Chinese Language into English.
Moreover, please do not change unified Hanyu Pinyin into separate groupings (such as changing Hanyu into Han Yu). In Wikipedia the common method is to group certain phrases together (i.e. Han Yu, which is a phrase, into Hanyu). Please do not separate words like "Yulu" and "Hongshu", which you did to Quotations From Chairman Mao Zedong. Yulu, i.e. Quotations / Collection of Quotations, is a phrase, and so is Hongshu, i.e. 'Red book', which has become a certain term meaning books about Communism. Aranherunar 14:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Keyboard protectors
I hate to break it to you, but the original article, while showing a sharp and expressive mind, and a strong vocabulary, was in somewhat strange English to say the least, as was your comment on my talk page. Rgds, Rich Farmbrough 17:13 26 August 2006 (GMT).
