User talk:Yeahsoo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Protecting Ieodo island
Just to let you know, adding {{sprotected}} or {{protected}} to a page is only a means for an admin to notify users that a page is protected. This does not actually confer protection to the article such as the notice you placed on Ieodo island. If you need help protecting a page, please contact an admin or request it. Thanks! -Loren 00:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Please discuss desired naming changes on Talk:Socotra Rock instead of unilaterally forking articles. Please note Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy which precludes us from including content or naming articles in such a way that they endorse the claim of one point of view. Additionally, please stop including protection templates on pages. Simply including the templates does not protect the page, which must be done by an admin. Falsely including such templates is frowned upon and persistant attempts are considered to be vandalism. -Loren 00:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Very good, please change Socotra Rock into a redirect, as in the first version, and remove the suyan rock redirection, I do not understand, why suyan rock must be a recirect of soroctra rock, how many people use socotra, while how many people use suyan. suyan is a official name in US goverment file.
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Malado.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Malado.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Visviva 13:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Erm..
Hello! Just wanted to notify you that even if you insert a moveprotected tag on an article, it isn't really protected against article-moving unless an admin actually designate the article as a move-protected article. The tag is only there to inform people when an admin move-protects an article, so the tag itself doesn't do anything. Happy editing & Keep up your good contribution to Wikipedia. ! Deiaemeth 03:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] about image:Suyan rock.png in Japanese Wikipedia article ja:蘇岩礁
You added image:Suyan rock.png in Japanese Wikipedia article ja:蘇岩礁.but That image is not clear about Copyright.please write back map's copy right in Image:Suyan rock.png.I will write same sentence in Japanese your note.if it was not clear, I will delete your image from ja:蘇岩礁.--Forestfarmer 03:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Anti-Japanese tone in articles
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --DeLarge 22:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Minor edits
Hi Yeahsoo,
You have been marking a large number of edits as minor. This includes many edits in which you substantially changed the tone and content of articles; for example, Kimchi. Please read Help:Minor edit, and do not mark edits as minor unless they are not controversial: "any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit is a single word." Cheers, -- Visviva 02:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Latest reverts
Best not try gaming the system. Your edits are too systematically disparaging for you to plead ingenuously that you're just trying to improve WP. For the record, the definition of {{db-attack}} is "a page created primarily to disparage its subject". Your history allows us to ascertain that without assuming bad faith.
As for Toyota, it was reverted for not being notable. Ford recalled 1.2m trucks and SUVs here, GM recalled 900,000 trucks here, and Chrysler, rather shamefully, had to recall 1.1m Jeeps, then another 800,000 Jeeps, then 1.2m minivans. When you sell 8m+ cars a year, recalling a million at a time is not uncommon. Your failure to compare or note these other recalls on their manufacturers' articles, or to put the Toyota recalls in context, is what gives away your anti-Japanese agenda. --DeLarge 23:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Interesting!A "1m" toyota recall is not an issue, but others recall 0.9m is an issue? Even you sell 8m, so what? Even Toyota did not deny it, why you can not accept? It is just tell a fact, no POV at all. Or, do you work for toyota?--Yeahsoo 23:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- No, none of them are an issue, I merely pointed out that Toyota don't recall any more vehicles than any other car maker. You're the one inserting recall info into Toyota without context, while ignoring the American companies' recall history completely, even though it's no better, and in Chrysler's case much worse. It's certainly not notable enough to warrant an entire section, unless you're trying to blow the issue out of proportion, which is exactly the anti-Japanese agenda you're denying. --DeLarge 00:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Canon (company). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At any rate please do not do more than three reverts in a 24h period. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --DeLarge 23:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Ryukyu1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Ryukyu1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- this is cut from the screen shot of a marine mapping system and add comments: Unfortunately, this is not enough to validate a free license. The marine mapping system images may be copyright protected, and derivatives thereof are hence also protected. Please name the mapping system to support your claim of a free image -- Chris 73 | Talk 23:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Also, the {{windows-software-screenshot}} is for fair use claims. However, a fair-use screenshot can only be used to comment on the software; it can't be used for maps and images cited in unrelated articles. -- Visviva 04:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
Hi Yeahsoo,
2 things: 1. I'm not Korean. 2. I will try to be more civil in the future. But frankly, when an editor is brazenly attempting to violate a very important policy just to push his or her own point of view, as you have been doing with Image:Suyan rock eng.jpg, that editor should not be surprised when other editors describe his or her behavior as "brazen."
Happy editing! -- Visviva 02:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Goguryeo
Please do tell me why the Chinese name is before the Korean name since it was not even a Chinese Kingdom or Dynasty? Btw if your going to respond please do so on my page. Jegal 16:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What a joke
Wow, Almost all of my sources are not Korean and they all Say Goguryeo was a Korean Kingdom and most certainly not Chinese. It is you who is using only Chinese sources. Ask older Chinese and they belive Goguryeo is Korean. only in the past couple of decades has the COMMUNIST PRC claim Goguryeo is Chinese. Using all sorts of "Reliable and proven sources" which of course none are non-Chinese. Talking about how South Korean uses propaganda is joke while you ignore China's massive communist propaganda and its own historical revisionism. Don't even reply back. China says bark and people like you bark. Jegal 22:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wow, who is the one that is barking now ? Huh?
Why so upset? Look at your red blooded face. It is all about scholarship and research. If you can find any ancient document said Goguryeo is Korean country, then we do not need to argue here. I can show you bunch of ancient book and how Tang emperor approved Goguryeo king of his title.Even Goguryeo history document is written in Chinese. But if you keep talking in that rude way, It is just my last word to you.--Yeahsoo 05:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Rude Way? Like your claims insults about SK goverment releasing propaganda, "how koreans are brain-Washed" The "huh" in the title is also provactive and sarcastic and insulting remark about Korean History? ah yes nice adding the Red Blooded Face argument AFTER the orginal Comment. ONE Goguryeo King or all of them? which would be impossiable because Goguryeo was often at war with Sui And Tang. There is a reason it is called one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. they were considered to be barbaric because Goguryeo traced its family lineage though the women and I belive was called one of the "Three Savage States" If Goguryeo was so backward then it couldn't be Chinese huh? You tell me about I need to do research but you havent done so in this aspect, Hangul wasn't developed until the 1400's until then everything was written in Chinese in Korea. Ancient Doucments? most if not all Written records were I belive in Wood. Wood is not going to survive over 1,400+ years. As it is There was no such thing as Korea the Three Korean Kingdoms were all seperate by varying degress of Genetics,Language and culture etc. There will be no document saying it was Literally saying it was Korean. As it is we see differently and neither one is going to change. Theres not point argueing So I say we drop it. Good Day and take care Jegal 22:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- This is the first time I heard "Three Savage States", you do not need to insult the ancient people just try to depart them from China. I just provide the record from ancient Chinese book,if you can not provide, then it is none of my business. I did not say Goguryeo is backward. I heard Korea has 6000 years history. and Chinese Charactors and paper were invented by Korean. How come you do not have any documents, and have to write on wood? Man you are way too emotional, I just don't like being called "bark", but you just keep yelling at me--Yeahsoo 23:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
-
Three Savage states I got from a Chinese source which was recently used by another Wikipedian. I did not say you said it was backward I was referring to Chinese sources which said Koreans were Backward. One is not way too emotional when in fact they were offended by your inital response. Again you insinuate all Koreans are ultra-nationalists. we all know Chinese-Characters and Paper were not created by a Korean. Korea Argueably has 6,000 Years of history depending on when you judge one's history. China as a country has more or less exsisted for around 2,200 years ago but then Chinese civilization more or less we first started to see around 5,000 years ago and older like 6,000+. There are documets most did not survive others were destroyed mainly by the Mongols and of course the Japanese. the 3K used alot of Woodblock though Paper was also used. I didn't call you personally "Bark" its a figure of speech. Jegal 23:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Again you insinuate all Koreans are ultra-nationalists. " I did not. And I know not all Koreans are ultra-nationalists. but it is not my fault people get this impression. Your goverment just change history book add another 1000 years history, with no common agreement in historians. and you know how many Chinese stuff are claimed invented by Korean. please do not try to explain asif they are real, I am tired of it. See those Korean history TV serials, all Chinese are bad guys and invaders, even worse than Japanese? While, Chinese still think Korean is good friend as since ancient time. For god's sake, Ming and Qing dynasty send army to help Korea defend against Japan and did not keep army after war. Even Gogurye is silla asked Tang to conquer. If waht your gov did is not brain washing, what is it? What is Korean trying to do? Build a grant Korean, like just in your history book, half China used to be Korean territory? Tell you what, a liar will never become true, even it is repeated a thousand times --Yeahsoo 00:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
yes, yes, China re-writes its history books and a number of Chinese ignore it and all they talk about is ROK and Japan re-writing history. one Famous example is the re-writing of the Tiananmen Square killings, and that is just one inciendent and more or less the most well-known example. Im not going to dig up other Examples. It didn't add 1,000 more years it claimed its bronze age was developed earlier. regardless you nor most people have the right to criticize other countries historical crap in the frist place. China does it Japan Does it North Korea does it South Korea does it America does it Russia does it Europe does it heck, even Africans do it. Its not just Koreans. The Japanese wanted to conquer China it was in their best interest to help Joseon during Imjin. when the Manchus took over China, Korea became a tributary state to Qing. Qing wanted Korea to stay under Manchu influence not westerner or Japanese. Actually Silla requested Aid and both Tang and Silla formed an alliance and destroyed goguryeo from which its survivors fled/captured by China,Silla and others fled and the rest formed Balhae. There are no such Books claimed that half of historical China belonged to Korea those are done by ultra-nationalists whose books are banned from public education. On the issue of Goguryeo the liar is China. Korea lies a lot too but on this issue its China who is lying. If this was such ancient knowledge then how come PRC only started claiming Goguryeo was Chinese in the past 2 decades?
As it is I think this is enough arguing. Don't reply as neither will I.
Good Day and take care Friend
Jegal 20:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi!
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. But it is important that you actually open a discussion about a template before deleting contents or inserting POV tags onto it, as tags are not meant to be inserted into templates (as they will disrupt whichever page they are used in).
Thanks! Deiaemeth 04:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request for mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Goguryeo, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. --Nlu (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I accuse you of sock puppetry
Hey! I accused of sock puppetry at Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Ksyrie. You may not be a sock puppet, and I'm aware of the possibility that you'd be really mad, as Ksyrie was. Let me apologize ahead of time, that this is just a if-scenario thing. Defend yourself at the discussion page. (Wikimachine 17:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Request for Mediation
 |
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Goguryeo.
|
