Talk:Yashmak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Law Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field.
???	This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yashmak article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the project page if you would like to participate. Happy editing!
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	To-do list for Yashmak:	edit  · history  · watch  · refresh
No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

[edit] De-stubbed

This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified.

By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubified.

If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 17:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

There is nothing about a stub which implies it is devalued, unreliable or credible. It is simply to draw attention to articles which currently only have small amounts of information (in this case, a single sentence!) I don't know enough on this to expand it myself, but obvious examples of how it could be expanded would be to include a picture, history, information on how common it is, and reasons why people wear it.

And if there really isn't anything more that can be said on it, then I would suggest a merge with veil, or (since this is basically just a definition) transferring to Wiktionary.

Please read Wikipedia:Stub. There is nothing wrong with being a stub - indeed, "The community values stubs as useful first steps toward complete articles." Mdwh 17:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)