User talk:XSG
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] re: Canyon High School (Anaheim, California)
I reverted your edits to Canyon High School (Anaheim, California) because they are strongly POV and unsourced. -- ArglebargleIV 23:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- Looking at the page history of the Canyon High School article, I, Zzyzx11, made two reversions: one on 07:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC) [1] and another on 04:09, 7 September 2006 [2]. They were made to revert the changes made by a suspected sockpuppet of a currently banned user. As per WP:BAN#Enforcement by reverting edits, "any edits made in defiance of a ban may be reverted to enforce the ban, regardless of the merits of the edits themselves." Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm very sorry if I removed any valid work from the article. That wasn't my intention. Soltras 00:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
My work will be reverted, but since you are not banned, please revert it back to the version by the first IP starting with "69" on the history section. It will not be reverted since you were not banned on Canyon High School (Anaheim, California) 69.230.41.31 05:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
With all due respect (as in, none at all), piss off. You're a vandal and I'm not stupid enough to vandalize a page that I created. —XSG 05:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Policing of Burning Man Article
You rock! —XSG 05:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yea, thanks for your edits too, the article is getting out of hand and needed some bold action to keep it from getting any worse. It was on the verge of just being a communal blog. I intend to to more constructive work (rather than just deleting bad edits), but you know--getting around to it eventually. I really love BM too, and would like to see the article become a featured article, which of course would never happend if the article continues in the direction it was going Brentt 20:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alex Randolph
Hi! I saw your request on Talk:Alex Randolph for help with the bio. It looked like a good start to me ... of course, I am very far from being an expert. Anyway, the next thing is to add the WPBiography tag (which I just did) so it'll get into that project, perhaps attract the attention of Biographiles. Also I think the tag creates a link you can follow to find more about biographies. You are on your way!! rewinn 02:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SCBT
Greetings!
It's pretty rare that I pull a db- tag off of an article. This was one of those cases. The company gets well over a million Google hits even when I filter out its own website [3] --and it appears in biotech journals, as well as the National Institute of Health (nih.gov). I won't revert you if you put the tag back, but in my opinion this is a notable company. Disclaimer--I'm not a biotech expert; I'm just a fairly experienced crud-patroller, with thousands of deletions, and to my eye this one seemed keepable. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 03:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
