User talk:Xanxz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you had read the URLs you provided, you would have noticed the following on the Broward County PDF:

In 2000, the Miami-Fort Lauderdale Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) included only Broward and Miami-Dade counties and was the 12th largest CMSA in the nation. If Palm Beach were included in the CMSA, the combined area would have ranked 10th.

Correct figures are available at the Census Bureau's site. - EurekaLott 22:27, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)


Hi again. I don't think there's a need to change anything else at the moment. It's great that we have more updated figures elsewhere on the site, and the official Census Bureau definitions seem to work pretty well. It's important to remember that the 2000 Census was a snapshot and we that need to compare apples to apples. If we update the figures or boundaries for one city in the metropolitan areas list to account for recent changes, we need to update them all. - EurekaLott 15:55, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Speaking of Census

You'll notice the Census Designated area Palm Aire, Florida... when you read the figures you'll realize that this area has nothing to do with the actual Palm Aire we know, love and avoid. I'm trying to figure out what to do with the article. Not sure if we're supposed to be deleting Census Designated Areas; but Palm Aire is not Palm Aire. It's a little tiny neighborhood (now) in Fort Lauderdale known as Palm Aire Village West. The only reason it gets its own designation is because it was unincorporated in 1990. I think the real Palm Aire deserves its own article but probably not my tiny little 500-home neighborhood. See Talk:Palm Aire, Florida astiquetalk 29 June 2005 01:44 (UTC)

this is not the real xaxnz/

the real one is only to be contacted on Yahoo.. after 4 years i have owned the account ""xanxz"" on yahoo untill an inposter stole it from me.... Thus being mad man A-K-A the wanna be xanxz.... thanks for listening people.... if someone needs me i do have the proof to backup me being the real xanxz come find me in yahoo chat room : midwest:3


The 'real' Xanxz? I don’t quite understand what you mean. I have had my Yahoo! email account under the name Xanxz for 5+ years. I have never received any emails belonging to someone else. Also, how can someone steal an email address? Can you show me your proof? I am looking forward to seeing what you are really talking about, thanks. Also when you say thanks for listening people, who are you talking too? This is my talk page, I dont think it is that popular yet.--Mad Max 21:13, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lauerdale Beach.jpg

Hi, I wrote that you are the photographer of this, since you write that you live in Ft. Lauderdale. I hope you don't think I assume too much. Feel free to change back if I am wrong. Thuresson 03:48, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lauderdale

Did you really take that picture? How come he didn't assume it was me?

Anyway, we need much more pictures here. I plan on putting my camera in the car and getting a few around the county... 2 million people in Broward and there's only two of us in Wikipedia? Harumph! Well, I might even take a picture of Publix in a few minutes except that technically this one is in Pompano and hardly says anything about life in Palm Aire, Florida astiqueparervoir 02:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Florida

This looks promising! Check it out! astiqueparervoir 03:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fort Lauderdale

Glad you like. I finally got a better skyline image today, from the 7th Floor of the Broward General parking garage. The great thing about this image is that it shows some clear evidence that downtown still has some significant Hurricane Wilma damage. astiqueparervoir 02:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Sunset. HAHAHAHAHAHA! And I didn't even catch it. astiqueparervoir 17:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Photo ray.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Photo ray.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Abu Badali 06:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Chop2.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Chop2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Abu Badali 06:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your contributions to Vlad III the Impaler

Hello,

I've reverted your contribution to the Vlad III the Impaler article because the things that you added are detailed in the next paragraph. Thank you Mihai -talk 14:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:An bryant.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:An bryant.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Quayle96.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Quayle96.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Antoine Walker.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Antoine Walker.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof 08:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:MingTsai.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MingTsai.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof 11:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:An bryant.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:An bryant.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof 11:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)