Talk:WUVN
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I mistakenly reverted 205.188.116.66's edit on September 3, thinking they copied the entire article once again (which, admittedly they didn't). However, while their latest edit seems to have been re-written so that it isn't entirely a carbon copy of the website in question, the re-write is still rather poorly written and structured (as is 205.188.116.xx's usual style, no offense to them). If anyone wants to restore 205.188.116.66's edit (as a properly written and structured article), go ahead. (I probably won't get around to this task anytime soon.) - Hinto 20:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- 205.188.116.66 had decided to copy the content from [1] again, and again interspersed content from that page with his/her own poorly articulated additions. I've attempted to re-word the article so that it sounds less like a direct copy from the aforementioned site; if you don't think it's enough, either re-word it further or just delete the whole thing and start from scratch (though I have a feeling 205.188.116.xx will do his/her thing again should that happen). - Hinto 02:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)