User talk:Wrestlinglover420

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Wrestlinglover420! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Metros232 23:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Metros232 23:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] mind your business

yeah hey u put that i erased someones comments but i didnt so could you please mind youre business? thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wrestlinglover420 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC).

4 times today you have reverted someone taking out your statement that he is a triple crown winner. That is unnecessary and inappropriate on Wikipedia. Metros232 23:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attack warning

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Metros232. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 01:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

He did not attack you. He politely asked you not to continue to edit war. Wikipedia has a policy that users may not revert more than 3 times in any 24 hour period. Please read that policy here. If you are not prepared to abide by the rules of Wikipedia you are very likely to be blocked from editing. One of those rules is that you may not make personal attacks on other users. Thanks, Gwernol 01:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] USM

I see from your record that you are known for being stubborn, using Petty insults, and not thinking things through. I will remind you that this is not a personal attack, as I couldn't care less about you, nor is it Vandalism. I would be a vandal if I was removing Information purely to make the article look bad, as stated in the 'Vandalism' part of the Wikipedia Help section; but I'm not, I am removing Information that hasn't been proven to be true and so could mislead people. You cannot justify with the Phrase 'Everyone Knows'. Imagine if every article began that way, ' Everyone Knows Abe Lincoln was the first American President', ' Everyone Knows that Tree Frogs are all mauve.'

Basically, I have an Ultimatum: just post a link to a site in which Brian Michael Bendis personally stated that 'Death of the Goblin' begins at Isue 110, and I'll revert the page. If you cannot get a link, you have no right to put the section for 'Death of the Goblin'; if you read the page's History, you will note that the section has previously been added and removed for the same reasons as now. Keep reverting the page and/or throwing prsonal insults at me, and I'll report you.

I don't want you to make me your enemy. I bear you no malice. SaliereTheFish 18:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Using an Internet forum as proof in not valid, as it may not be true. Post the link in my User Talk Page.

[edit] *Sigh*

You think your big threatening and speeling mistakes make you look tough, but they don't. Your 'Vandal' comments fall back on you, because you've vandalised my page and the Ultimate Spider-Man one. You also show that by not supplying a link you have none.

I'm very sorry, but I'm going to have to report you.

[edit] Bad Grammar again

1) Administrators do not 'Take Sides'; they deal fairly.

2) You do have a duty to give me a link, not for me but for the article.

3) I can prove that it isn't the next arc simply because there is no evidence that it is.

4) Unlike you, I have made some people angry but have made peace with them afterwards.

[edit] As a Final Note

1) There is no confirmation anywhere on ultimatecentral.com apart from Rumour

2) Post on the 'Talk' Page, which is for talk, not on the 'User' Page, which is about the User. Get it right next time.

[edit] blocked

I have temporarily blocked you for violation of wikipedias 3 reversion rule After this block has expired, feel free to continue contribtuions on a constructive manner. Should your disruptive behavior continue, you will more than likley be blocked again. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

That's bs that info has been there for a month and then that dude deleted it. this is so stupid.

Please don't delete things from your user page. Archive instead, please. Flyguy649 20:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Continued personal attacks

The edit summary you used in this edit is absolutely unacceptable. We have a strictly applied policy on Wikipedia that you may not make personal attacks on other editors. If you are unable to remain civil and treat other editors with respect (even when you disagree with them) you will have your editing rights withdrawn. Please treat this request seriously. Thanks, Gwernol 21:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WrestleMania 22

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi. You may not be aware that the standard for inclusion of information on Wikipedia is verifiability. That is, can a reader find confirmation of the information at an independent reliable source? If so, the information is verifiable and can be included. If not, it is not verifiable. Your own experience is not an acceptable source, because others cannot access or verify it. The website in question is a reliable source. Therefore, even if the website is in error, we are obliged to follow what it says unless you can find another reliable source which says the song was not used. If you can do so, it would be appropriate to add a note saying something like "Although the WWE website indicates that "Baby Hates Me" by Danko Jones was used in this event, it was not.<ref>{{cite web template, filled out}}</ref>" I hope that this makes sense to you — in the meantime, please stop reverting verified information; instead, discuss the matter on the article's talk page. If you revert again within 24 hours of your earlier edits, you will be blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Once Again

I've had to report you for not learning from mistakes. Until you give me a link to a specific source, then that info is not verifiable and therefore cannot be put on Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SaliereTheFish (talk • contribs) 13:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Nope

Yet again, you can't just call me names and ask me to read a magazine I may or may not be able to buy, because you're suggesting that eveyrone who wants to know whether the arc is out after 'Ultimate Knights' must be party to he same treatment. You may not be banned yet, but you will soon. Finally, this is not a war, it is a discussion.

[edit] Edit War

Please cease your edit war with User:SaliereTheFish. I have also left him a warning to do the same. Please discuss the edits for the page on it's talk page. Thank you. - Century0 14:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:3RR. -- TheDarkArchon 16:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 24h

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

yandman 18:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thought I should mention

That your idiocy has blocked the page from editing. My revert shall stay there until further notice. Thankyou very much for your kind words, and have a good night.

[edit] uve been reported

Please do not threaten other editors with "You've been reported." I don't even know what that means, and I'm an admin. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 22:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 90 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. You grossly violated 3RR today and have made too many personal attacks in the last several days. Please cool down before editing again, Metros232 22:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WSX

"MTV has removed next week's scheduled airing of Wrestling Society X and replaced it with "High School Stories: Scandals, Pranks, Controversies."

MTV's website has also removed from WSX from its listing of official MTV series. At this point, the www.WSX.MTV.com website is still up and features this week's version of WSXtra. The most recent episode of WSX was not posted." TheNewMinistry 17:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Whole Point of Punishment...

...Is to make sure you don't do it again.

You Made a Mistake. Learn from it.

Thanks to the kind user who put this but forgot to put their name. I guess they are a coward.

[edit] Talk Pages

Talk pages are not your personal forum. Keep your personal opinions out of them unless it relates to the current conversation. Insults about the article's subject do not count as relating to it. Thank you. - Century0 12:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Nishkid64 01:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Since your block ended you've continued your disruption, these blocks will keep escalating until you're finally indefinitely blocked, so I strongly suggest you stop the nonsense and stop it now, Metros232 02:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal Warning

I'd suggest that you be very careful where you edit from here on in...it might be useful to just post what you want to edit on the talk page so that everyone can agree whether it should be added. That way, you probably won't get banend again. 11:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Don't ignore well-meaning advice.SaliereTheFish 19:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sign your posts

Why do you never sign your posts? It's not that hard, and you are supposed to do it. You can do it by either clicking the 10th button icon (the one that looks like a signature) or typing ~~~~. TJ Spyke 03:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Not from what i've seen. Hehe, you even forgot to sign your post saying you always sign. TJ Spyke 12:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

You must be in a hurry all the time because I don't remember you ever signing your posts. Just typing "Wrestlinglover420" isn't signing, you either have to type ~~~~ or click the sign symbol, which will sign your post (look at my replies for what is a signed post). TJ Spyke 13:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Fine, whatever. If you are too lazy to sign your posts, I don't care. TJ Spyke 13:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm just trying to help you. Not signing your posts will hurt your standing among other Wikipedians, especially if you ever want to be an admin. TJ Spyke 22:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Signatures. TJ Spyke 22:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal Attacks

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:WrestleMania 23, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Calling people morons because of a joke they made, that you don't like, is not appropriate. If you disagree with something on an article's talk page say so in a calm manner. Bmg916^{Speak to Me}_{Leave Your Mark} 14:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

I have blocked you for 2 weeks due to repeated personal attacks. This is your 5th block. Next time, it may be indefinite. Please use this time to read up on WP:CIVIL and other related policies. Thank you. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Well thats interesting considering i did not do repeated personal attacks. This time the ban is unjust. If someone has a problem with me they need to say it. The ban i dont care about. ITs bullcrap, but i really dont care. excuse me for defending a wrestling legend. BMG916 erased info he shouldnt have erased. I want the block lifted. This just further proves my point that wikipeida is completely one sided and nobody on here listens to reason. Wrestlinglover420 16:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you telling me that all 4 times you have been blocked previous this is for false reasons and everybody is out to get you? I planned on a 12 hour block or a stern warning until i see your repeat pattern of such abusive behavior.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thats not what im saying at all what im saying is this time the ban is unjust. first i corrected two felloe wikipedians who were making fun of two people. then one of them put a wthreat on my page. finnally i wrote back to them not in a threatening manner but in a informative matter. He erases this which is against wikipedia policy to erase talk page material. Now I want to know what did i do to deserve a ban? thats what i thought. Wrestlinglover420 21:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I've explained my side of the story to Chris. Now here's things from my perspective for you Wrestlinglover: You didn't correct anyone, we corrected ourselves when I erased our comments because they weren't productive conversation on the article's talk page (good editors can admit when they're wrong), who cares if we made a joke about Ric Flair and Dusty Rhodes, I'm pretty sure they have a sense of humour. Anyhow, I digress. I did not attack you, I warned you for calling us "morons", an obvious personal attack. You did not reply to me on my user talk page in an informative manner whatsoever as the edit history will show. You replied in an attacking manner, implying, once again, that I was a "moron". When I erased this comment, you once again placed a snide, obnoxious remark that had "I'm better than you" overtones on my talk page. I then erased this as a personal attack and you were then blocked. You deserve a ban for being generally disruptive, argumentative, inflammatory, and ignorant to the fact that you are. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 22:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppets

I am lengthing your block to 1 month for abusive use of sockpuppets. Next sock I find, I will indef block you. Please refrain from creating sockpuppets to avoid your block. Thank you. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

That's bullcrap I havent even been on wikipedia since ive been banned. Stop with the damn harrassment between you and bmg ive had enough of it. Wrestlinglover420 14:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)