Talk:Wound healing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sorry I made this page so rediculously long; it's most of the contents of a paper I wrote for a wound healing tutorial for school. If you want to make new pages out of each section or something, that would be cool. Though I'd say this page still needs little blurbs about each phase and links to the pages in that case. Also, the proliferation phase is too long in this page and the maturation phase is too short. You can help by expanding the maturation phase and cutting parts you think are unnecessary from proliferation. Also, if you want to take the time to turn all the text's references into footnote links so the text is smaller and easier to read, that would be great. And if you want to find links for all of the references and eliminate ones you think are unnecessary, also great. Matterafact, do whatever you want to it. --Delldot 01:17, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- You have nothing to apologise for. I think this is excellent, interesting and very well supported. Things that might improve it would be internal Wikipedia links and illustrations. --Mylesclough 06:33, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'm trying to change the Harvard refs to footnote style to make it shorter and more readable, but I can't get the numbers to correspond to the numbers in the footnotes; they just go up in order they're put in the article, even if the same thing is cited twice. Anyone know how to fix this? If you do, let me know or do it yourself. Thanks. --Delldot 14:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] wow
Thanks for this straight forward explanation of what is often seen as an overwhelming process. I know what you mean about writing too much. I had to cut out most of process in the report I'm writing. But such is the work of editing, right? Thanks again. this is just fantastic.
great work! so interesting...
A lot of this article was removed at the end of May 2006. I'm wondering why it was all removed.
[edit] maggots?
Why are there links to sites about maggots when this not discussed in the text? The final link is also inaccesiblem Mike 12:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Major edit in progress
A great deal of material was blanked in may and I didn't notice till now. I'm in the process of restoring it and many of the refs that were removed. I'm also making some changes, and this may take a couple hours. I'd appreciate it if, as a favor to me, you could wait to make any edits until after I remove the notice. If that's not possible, let me know and I can add your edits into the version I'm working on. Thanks much, delldot | talk 04:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm about half done converting the refs and have removed the in use template. I'll have to put it up again when I finish replacing the refs. Thanks everyone! delldot | talk 06:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] scarring
I added a little on scarring, and was going to add two recent reviews but for some reason it won't work, can someone post to the tutorial on adding references, I can't seem to get the right combination of links. The reference are Eur J Surg. 2002;168(10):523-34. and Wound Repair Regen. 2005 Jan-Feb;13(1):7-12. I plan to extend the scarring section slightly and improve the links to pathological scarringGasboy 23:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Suggested refinement: proliferation phase
Overall quite good, however I think the section on proliferation could use some work on flow --the tie between collagen/angiogenesis/epithelialization and granular tissue was a bit confusing. I'm by no means an expert on this and I don't feel comfortable making the changes myself. --Bobak 23:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
