User talk:Witkacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is inactive since 08:34, 14 September 2005. This user is also not replying to emails. If you have any questions about this user, you might find help at Wikipedia talk:Polish Wikipedians' notice board. We also help with finding sources and licenses for the images!

W imieniu Rzeczypospolitej Space Cadet 22:24, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Shortcut: WP:WNBP

• Sandbox
• Notebook
• Wikimedia Commons
• Wikiquote
• Black Book

Contents 1 Discussions 1.1 Powodzenia 1.2 How to deal with Poles ;-) 2 Harcerskie Grafiki 3 Dobry przykład do Antypolonizmu 4 Page protected 5 Bf-109 6 3RR 7 anti-Polonism 8 Rewizjonizm idzie pełną parą 9 Polish Plumber 10 Zerknij 11 Faustyna Kowalska 12 Bismarck jako przyjaciel Polski 13 Polecam też 14 List of Polish Films 15 Translation of Deutschlandlied 16 Gdańsk 17 Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73 18 asking for support 19 Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73 (again) 20 Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73 (nr 4 or 5?) 21 Boze Igrzysko 22 Królewiec 23 Antypolonizm odblokowany 24 Daniel Pipes 25 Great work! 26 Images 27 Władysław Krzysztof Grabiński 28 Wincenty Frelichowski 29 Image:Krzyzyk ZHP.jpg 30 Image Tagging Image:Lilijka zhr z napisem.gif 31 Image Tagging Image:Wawel XVIw.jpg 32 AfD 33 Image:Lwow pod zaglami 2.jpg 34 Image Tagging Image:Policja2.jpg 35 Image copyright problem with Image:Wegorzewo Mapa.png 36 Image copyright problem with Image:StanislawOstrowski.jpg 37 Image copyright problem with Image:Jezioro goplo.jpg 38 Image copyright problem with Image:Marek Edelman.jpg 39 Image copyright problem with Image:Pagon-starszy bosman.png 40 Image copyright problem with Image:Pagon komandorpodporucznik m.png 41 Image copyright problem with Image:Stanislaw_Broniewski.jpg 42 Image Tagging Image:Admiral-Floty P.jpg 43 Obrazy Witkacego 44 Please check your WP:NA entry 45 Image copyright problem with Image:Marynarka.png 46 Image Tagging for Image:Order_Orla_Bialego2.jpg 47 Image Tagging for Image:Order_Orla_Bialego3jpg.jpg 48 Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Karol_Czartoryski.jpg 49 WP:POLMIL 50 Image copyright problem with Image:Ignacy Daszynski.jpg 51 Image Tagging Image:Chrzanowski order orla bialego.jpg 52 Image:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg 53 Image Tagging for Image:Brazowy_Krzyz_Zaslugi_z_Mieczami_zdjecie.jpg 54 Image Tagging for Image:Bronislaw_Duch.jpg 55 Image copyright problem with Image:Dar_Mlodziezy_z_masztu.jpg 56 Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Asnyk.jpg 57 Image copyright problem with Image:Herb Glemp.gif 58 Image copyright problem with Image:Adam_Daniel_Rotfeld.jpg 59 Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski.jpg 60 Image copyright problem with Image:Gielda_siedziba.gif 61 Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski1.jpg 62 Edmund Taczanowski 63 Image copyright problem with Image:Ossolineum.jpg 64 Image Tagging for Image:Krzysztof_Mikolaj_Radziwill.jpg 65 Image Tagging for Image:Skarzysko_kosciol_nsj.jpg 66 Image copyright problem with Image:Polonia_Restituta.jpg 67 Image Tagging for Image:Michal_Grazynski.png 68 one contributor 69 Image copyright problem with Image:Robert_Korzeniowski.jpg 70 Image copyright problem with Image:KrzyzOswiecimski-rew.jpg 71 Image Tagging Image:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg 72 Saints Wikiproject 73 Status 74 Your template is listed for deletion 75 Image:Teodor Potocki.jpg 76 Image tagging for Image:Orlik_Team.gif 77 Image copyright problem with Image:Sejm sala obrad.jpg 78 Image tagging for Image:KrzyzHR.gif 79 Image tagging for Image:Order_Stanislawa2.gif 80 Unspecified source for Image:Apolonia Ustrzycka.jpg 81 Untagged image 82 Image copyright problem with Image:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg 83 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Parasolka n.gif)

[edit] Discussions

[edit] Powodzenia

Widzę że znowu przypuszczono szturm na twoją osobę.Powodzenia ! --Molobo 23:12, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] How to deal with Poles ;-)

Hello,

meta:How to deal with Poles was written by a Polish Wikipedian as a tongue-in-cheek answer to the attitude you try to fight. Discuss with sensible people, don't waste your time for morons and generally take it easy (Wikistress).
Regards,
Kpjas 09:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Witam,

meta:How to deal with Poles zostało napisane przez polskiego Wikipedystę jako żartobliwa odpowiedź na postawy, które ty starasz się zwalczać. Z rozsądnymi dyskutuj, nie trać czasu na kretynów i tak w ogóle nie przejmuj się za bardzo (Wikistress).
Pozdrowienia,
Kpjas 09:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Harcerskie Grafiki

Dziękuję serdecznei za wspaniałe harcerskie grafiki. Zaczołem je umieszczać na poslkiej wikipedii. Czy nie lepiej byłoby od razu umieszczać je na Commons ?? Założyłem tam: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Polish_Scouting i zaczołem umieszczać polskie harcerskie grafiki. Przeniesiesz i pokasujesz z angielskiej wiki grafiki przeniesione na commons?

• • W dużym skrócie :

Naramiennik wędrowniczy (NIE PAGON!) to tradycyjne oznaczenie  
przynależności do wspólnoty wędrowniczej. Pojęcie to jest dosyć szerokie 
i oznacza między innymi : wędrowników, instruktorów w wieku wędrowniczym 
(16-25 lat), instruktorów wędrowniczych (pracujących z wędrownikami), czy  
też byłych wędrowników. Pojęcia te są rozwinięte w następnych pytaniach.  
Uwaga, naramiennika nie dostaje się automatycznie, należy go zdobyć. 
Sposób zdobycia naramiennika wygląda różnie w zależności od tego czy 
jesteśmy wędrownikiem, czy instruktorem wędrowniczym.

Szumyk 07:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• Naramiennik wędrowniczy nie jest oznaką stopnia , ani bycia instruktorem wędrowniczym!! jest tylko i wyłącznei oznaczeniem osób które ukończyły próbę wędrowniczą. Poczytaj tu: [1] Szumyk 15:58, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dobry przykład do Antypolonizmu

Myślę że z czasem można rozszerzyć artykuł o antypoloniżmie w Rosji.Służę jakby co przykładami.Na razie podaję ci niezły przykład, fragmenty antypolskiej książki z Rosji do przeczytania http://www.mediactivist.ru/action/27 Jest po rosyjsku ale wystarczy wrzucic do Babelfish http://world.altavista.com/. Miłej lektury...--Molobo 22:25, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Page protected

I have protected this page after the plea on Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard#The Return. Please contact me or another administrator to unlock this page if you wish to communicate using this page. Bratsche^{talk 5 pillars} 19:07, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

I've unprotected it - two days is likely enough. Dan100 (Talk) 21:51, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bf-109

Bf-109 has reported that you are "vandalising" his page on WP:AN/I.

If you suspect Bf-109 of being a sockpuppet, the proper procedure is to put up a {{sockpuppet}} tag, or report it to W:AN/I and set out your evidence. If the admins adjudge that your suspicions are correct, then the blocks will follow. Otherwise, the revert war you are engaging in is pretty useless. --khaosworks (talk• contribs) 15:51, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't have the ability to check his IP, but like I said, air your concerns on WP:AN/I and someone will look into it. --khaosworks (talk• contribs) 16:52, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

You have broken the Wikipedia:Three revert rule at Lithuania - don't do it! Seek help at WP:AN or call a Wikipedia:Request for comments in situations like this. Edit wars get you nowhere.

You could be blocked 24 hours for this, but I am chosing to warn you instead - however, if you break the 3RR again at some point in the future, you will be blocked. Dan100 (Talk) 21:53, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Just occured to me that you did seek help at the admin's noticeboard. Sorry about that! Dan100 (Talk) 22:24, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] anti-Polonism

By sie nie rozpisywac - mowiac o Czechach, chodzilo Ci o to jak w 1919 Czesi zajeli Zaolsie, gdy Polacy wojowali z Bolszewikami? Co do Wilna - Chodzi Ci o to jak Pilsudski przylaczyl Wilno do Polski z 1,5% zamieszkalych tam Litwinow?

(Not to make it too long - when you were writing about Czechs you ment that Chechs had invaded Zaolsie when Poles had been fighting with bolsheviks? As far as Wilno is concerned, you ment that Pilsudski had united Wilno with Poland when it had been inhabited by 1.5% of Lithuanians?)

Note that I added in parentheses in both cases that it is independent of whether it was right or wrong. And yes, I admit Czechs' action in 1919 was deeply unfair. And yes, I admit, Pilsudski defended in this way Polish rights in Wilno at that point of time.

Let me also point out that Polish-Lithuanian international relations between WWI and WWII were very difficult and it is atributed in many history Polish handbooks to the Pilsudski action (of course this was not the only reason).

As for the Czech, case. In 1938 Zaolsie was recaptured by Poland during a period of time in which Czechoslovakia was destroyed by Hitler which is very much comparable to the example you gave. And of course, 1919 events caused a certain deal of Polish anti-Czechism while 1938 events caused a certain deal of Czech anti-Polonism. You cannot deny that we Poles are laughing at many Czech phrases (like 'zavazadlovy kufr', 'jit dozadu' and so on). Similarly, Czechs often privately express that we Poles are less civilized and have very rude language (for instance 'szukać').

And of course all cases of anti-Polish hatred and sentiment should be condemned. Alx-pl 09:11, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your links. They are very helpful. Remember however that we want to achieve NPOV which means we have to take into account other POVs in descriptions. It doesn't mean we have to be less bold in stating our POV, but we have to discuss it with others and take into account their POVs. This, in particular, means we should not alienate people we discuss with. In particular, we should discuss German anti-Polonism with Germans, Russian with Russians and so on. A text which is a result of such a discussion can really be called neutral. A text which is based solely on Polish sources and which is edited solely by Polish editors is just a Polish POV. Let's see what can be a result of such an attitude in case of Rudi Pawelka. I hope you will help to keep all the content which is important from Polish POV, but note that there must be a certain deal of content which represents the German POV. Alx-pl 19:30, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

You just put Antipolonismus into Google and you can obtain as a result an article like this which is an evidence that Germans or at least German speaking citizens of Switzerland (this requires verification) recognise that there is German anti-Polonism (I guess Philipp Ther is German). Although we must read the article carefully to add text to the article. Remember, we must also keep balance. Alx-pl 20:40, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Hello, Witkacy, after discussing on its talk page, I've been looking at the latest changes the protected article Anti-Polonism has gone through. To my great astonishment I found out that the wikipedian who kept reverting my changes without telling me why, was noone active on the talk page. It was you. So before the protection expires I'd like you to tell me where and especially why you disagree with my change, if you still disagree with it. By doing so we can discuss it and settle our differences without having problems again as soon as the article's protection is over. Thank you in advance.NightBeAsT 20:42, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Look at what was negotiated for Pawelka case. It seems that we reached something that is a description which presents his actual role. Comments are welcome. Alx-pl D 18:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rewizjonizm idzie pełną parą

W antypoloniżmie już sie zaczęło o wstrętnych zbrodniach Aliantów przeciw Narodowi Niemieckiemu ;) ...--Molobo 01:53, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Polish Plumber

I am just contacting you as you made an edit to this article. An anon user has edited every instance of the word advertisement to the word propaganda. I can't revert further without breaking the rules. Could you please examine this article? --TimPope 21:47, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, I am glad you found an image of the "nurse" as I couldn't find one when I was looking :) --TimPope 16:30, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Zerknij

Na talk antipolonizm.Wśrod potoku obelg na Polskę Alx uczynnie podpowiada Niemcom jak udowodnić że jesteśmy obłąkani iż mówimy o tym jak Rudi Pawelka oskarża Polske o wywołanie wojny(co dość śmieszy skoro nawet GW o tym pisała).--Molobo 23:24, 23 August 2005 (UTC) Oh już się pojawiło że GW to szmatławiec skoro podało że Pawelka oskarża Polskę o IIWŚ.

D

--Molobo 22:32, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Faustyna Kowalska

I spoke too soon about Faustyna Kowalska being cleaned up. I noticed your edit of the picture cutline just now, so I wanted to let you know that I did a considerable cleanup, but after your edit. Take a look at Faustyna Kowalska now. While I think it is a fairly miserable page, I hope it reads and looks better now. Pozdrawiam Cie, -- Mareklug 01:05, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bismarck jako przyjaciel Polski

Dałem link na stronie NB z przemówieniem Bismarka, w którym uzasadnia Kulturkampf istnieniem"Polskiego problemu".Czekam na odpowiedż iż udowadnia ona iż naprawdę Kulturkampf trzeba zaliczyć do antyniemieckiej postawy, bo Polacy nie chcieli się zgermanizować ;P Jak chcesz to tu jest link: http://h-net.org/~german/gtext/kaiserreich/speech.html PS:Można dodać, że w Niemczech prekursorem "Problemu żydowskiego" był "Problem polski" i dać link do przemówienia. Molobo

[edit] Polecam też

Bardzo ciekawy artykuł: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~sarmatia/401/212schlott.html

[edit] List of Polish Films

Will you please put up a notice regarding the creation & population of List of Polish language films on WP:PWNB? Dzeki... Benzamin 18:05, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Translation of Deutschlandlied

Hi. I tried to initiate some conversation on the talk page of Das Lied der Deutschen in order to resolve the ugly revert was you are engaged in. I would be grateful if you commented on the discussion page instead of perpetuating this behaviour. Best, Arbor 06:16, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gdańsk

Wydaje mi się, że można by powalczyć o nazwę Gdańsk dla okresu 1466 do 1793. Skupiłbym się nad tym, czy to głosowanie Talk:Gdansk/Vote przed jego wdrożeniem zdobyło konsensus zgodnie z Wikipedia:Survey guidelines. W szczególności opis dla okresu 1466 do 1793 jest zupełnie nieadekwatny do rzeczywistości historycznej tamtych czasów. Alx-pl D 13:32, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Myślę, że takie rozwiązanie, choć miłe mojemu sercu, byłoby bardzo trudne do przeprowadzenia. Trzebaby znaleźć dobre argumenty, że tak jest sensownie. Przykładem dobrego argumentu byłoby, że w przypadku jakiegoś innego ważnego miejsca historycznego stosuje się właśnie zasadę nazywania (w kontekstach historycznych) zgodnie ze współczesnym stanem rzeczy. Gdyby się znalazło kilka takich przypadków, to nasze stanowisko byłoby trudne do obalenia, ale obawiam się, że takie przypadki trudno będzie wynaleźć, a ja się za słabo znam na historii/geografii, żebym mógł w tym aktywnie uczestniczyć. (Choć przychodzą mi do głowy jakieś przykłady, które można byłoby próbować zbadać: Turku/Åbo, Oslo/Christiania, Nice/Nizza.) Może natomiast są tutaj jacyś bosowie, którzy by to umieli znaleźć? Alx-pl D 14:06, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Kiepsko, że Cię zablokowali. Jeszcze jeden przykład do zbadania Strasbourg/Straßburg. Gdzie jest ta dyskusja o ponowieniu głosowania o Gdańsku? Alx-pl D 12:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73

I have blocked you for 24 hours for disrupting Wikipedia. You have repeatedly removed double naming from articles against community consensus. The last instance was Georg Forster [2]. As per Talk:Gdansk/Vote, there was a more than 2/3rd majority for double naming, both for Gdansk and for the cities with a shared history in general. There was also a more than 2/3rd majority for biographies of German people to have the order German/Polish (and vice versa for Polish people). You are very well aware of this vote, and even you yourself said that a 2/3rd majority is good enough for consensus. I also have warned you again on your talk page (which you kindly removed [3]) Hence I block you for disrupting Wikipedia for repeatedly and over the span of multiple months going against community consensus. I fully expect you to bitch on any noticeboard and talk page you can get a hold of, feel free to do so. On an unrelated side note, please do not revert my talk page. Also, you can still edit your talk page. -- Chris 73 Talk 14:17, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

Thats abuse of Admin rights. First of all you should know that "users should not block those with whom they are currently engaged in conflict". I have not committed any violation of the Wikipedia policy. --Witkacy 14:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Blocking policy: Disruption

Sysops may, at their judgement, block IP addresses or usernames that disrupt the normal functioning of Wikipedia. Such disruption is to be objectively defined by specific policies, and may include changing other users' signed comments or making deliberately misleading edits.

You have changed names of Polish cities to German ones, and i reverted you. So tell me please, according to what policy did you blocked me?--Witkacy 14:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

As far as Chris73's actions are concerned, he left the article cited above (Georg Forster) with both the Polish and German forms of the name (Diff). Witkacy, from what I can see, was insisting on removal of the German form, leaving the Polish version only (Diff 1, Diff 2). The block seems legitimate under the Gdansk decision. To avoid any appearance of impropriety, I have removed Chris73's block, and placed my own for the remaining 23 hours. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:31, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

The block seems legitimate under the Gdansk decision.

Under which rule of the Wikipedia policy?--Witkacy 19:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

unblocked and reblocked Witkacy for 23 hours as a (hopefully) neutral third party to the dispute [4]

neutral third party? I dont believe you are neutral, Chris 73 asked you - per email? - for help, that's all. However, Im still waiting for the answer, which rule I violated.--Witkacy 20:15, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm afraid you are mistaken. Chris 73 never emailed me, and as far as I know, I've never had any contact with him prior to my renewal of his block. Further, I have never been involved in the apparently contentious disputes surrounding the use of Polish versus German city names. I posted a note about the block at Wikipedia:Account suspensions immediately after I placed it because I felt that its potentially controversial nature might warrant further review.

Wikipedia:Blocking policy allows administrators broad discretion to block editors whose behavior–in the admin's judgement–is disruptive to Wikipedia's smooth functioning. By removing entirely reference to the German names of the cities in question, you took an action which a reasonable editor (and veteran of the Gdansk/Danzig debates, especially) should understand would be inflammatory. I personally am not bothered over whether the German or the Polish name should come first in Georg Forster's article, though it would seem that cooler heads have been able to reach some sort of compromise on the talk page. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 04:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

W imieniu Rzeczypospolitej: Space Cadet 22:24, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] asking for support

Hello, since you are interested in Lithuania I thought that you might support our letter to Centre for Cartography, Vilnius University. We are asking to release their maps found at www.balticdata.info under GFDL licence so they could be used in articles about Lithuania. So far we got 14 people to "sign" it. The draft in very very rough English is available at user:Renata3/letter. If you decide to support it, I'll need just your first and last names together with your user name. You can leave it on my talk page or send it via email: just attact @gmail.com to my user name. Renata3 22:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73 (again)

Hi Witkacy. Double naming has been supported by more than 2/3rd of the votes, which is enough even by your standards. Since you still insist on going against community consensus, I block you again for disrupting Wikipedia. You may complain about this, but for the next 48 hours these complaints are limited to your talk page -- Chris 73 Talk 14:53, September 6, 2005 (UTC) Do zobaczenia za 48 godzin.Postaramy sie jako tako przyuważyć niemieckich wandali.--Molobo 16:12, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Since you started right away again with going against consensus after your block expired, I have blocked again. -- Chris 73 Talk 09:59, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

"users should not block those with whom they are currently engaged in conflict". Is it possible to stop this biased administrator? --Witkacy 10:04, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

German nationalistic POV pushing and stalking by Chris [5]--Witkacy 10:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Witkacy, Chris 73 is 'stalking' you because you're repetitively engaging in the same disruptive behaviour. The pattern of edits in your contributions list is pretty distinctive. You are welcome to use Wikipedia's dispute resolution methods to try to come to some peacable compromise. It is not acceptable to carry on with the same edits–removal of German forms of city names from articles where both Polish and German names appear–and to expect admins to ignore you while you do something that (if ignored) would restart a lot of unproductive and outright destructive edit wars.

After your block ends, I would encourage you to follow the example of User:Lysy. He has kept a cool head, and achieved what seem to be reasonable compromises on a number of pages that have experienced naming conflicts. It is possible to discuss these matters calmly and rationally, without edit warring and without impugning the motives or character of your fellow editors. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:13, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

"Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.."

I will repeat myself, but according to the rules on Wikipedia, edits like that [6] dont disrupt wikipedia - the name of the city is Gdańsk (and German POV pushers like Chris and his little fellow Nighbeast should live with that) Its a compromise to use the German name from 1795 until 1945, but pushing the German name for time periods when the city was part of Poland is unacceptable.

You can justify his abuse of admin rights, but i have not broke any official wiki-rule.

Thanks for you comment, Chris again asked you for help... [7]--Witkacy 14:14, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Actually, that's the first time that Chris 73 contacted me, presumably because I had involved myself in your first block. You will note that that comment was in relation to your second block on this issue, not the current (third) one. In all cases, I posted my comments regarding the blocks on the appropriate high-visibility pages (the administrator's noticeboard and the account suspensions log) where they could be readily reviewed by other Wikipedians (and in particular, other admins who might choose to undo the block if I or Chris 73 had grievously erred.)

I strongly encourage you to stop edit warring and engage in discussion. There is a reasonable argument to be made, and there are reasonable people out there to hear it. Calling people names, removing German city names without comment, and shouting admin abuse don't help to resolve the issue. Quite frankly, I don't think it is possible to immediately solve this problem, and I would counsel patience. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

strongly encourage you to stop edit warring

stop to reverting POV?.. (bad idea..)

and engage in discussion

Discussion about what? The name of the city is Gdańsk. United Nations map of Poland[8], official website of Gdańsk [9]...

"shouting admin abuse don't help to resolve the issue"

Admins who abuse their powers should be banned. I wonder that until now such rule was not created. My blocks are a nasty example how admins abuse their powers for POV pushing.

Fiat iustitia, ruat coelum ! :)--Witkacy 16:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

(P.S. User:Nightbeast vandalised and violated the 3RR on my talk page - needs to be blocked)--Witkacy 16:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

If you're talking about the edits like this one, it looks like he was removing remarks that he thought were a personal attack. I can see how Nightbeast might have found those comments insulting. Further, characterizing the edits as 'vandalism' is factually incorrect and might itself constitute a personal attack. (There is a formal description of what constitutes vandalism at Wikipedia:Vandalism.) While Nightbeast has not been a paragon of good faith and calm discussion in this dispute, it is not helpful to bait him.

As for 'reverting POV', substituting your preferred point of view for someone else's doesn't resolve anything; it simply perpetuates an edit war. Use the talk pages and RFC to discuss NPOV. Engaging in drive-by reversion without discussion just makes it easier for people to dismiss your opinion. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:50, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Nightbeast ? He deleted Bismarck speech on Bismarck policies calling it a POV :D

--Molobo 15:33, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73 (nr 4 or 5?)

Since you started right away again with going against consensus after your block expired, I have blocked you again. -- Chris 73 Talk 15:07, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Once again Chris 73 ignored the Blocking Rules for pushing German POV. Biased admins like you are a shame for Wikipedia Witkacy

And again stalking edits [[10] Witkacy

[edit] Boze Igrzysko

Witkacy, I understand your annoyance with calling the city Danzig during the centuries when it was part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Unfortunately, that appears to be the norm in English language historiography. Even Norman Davies, one of the most renowned writers on Polish history generally considered very sympathetic to Poland, uses the German name Danzig during this period in his magisterial work God's Playground: A History of Poland. So, please, please stop removing the German name. Balcer 18:48, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

"God's Playground" is not an encyclopedia! Britannica calls the city Gdansk throughout the ages, even Free City of Gdansk. Space Cadet 20:57, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

"God's Playground" is widely acknowledged to be the best history of Poland available in the English language. It is "better" than Encyclopedia Britannica! The fact that it uses Danzig suggests that name should at minimum be mentioned in Wikipedia articles dealing with that period. Witkacy's attempts to eradicate any mention of it at all are unjustified, to say the least. Balcer 21:36, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Like I said... Wiki is an encyclopedia, not a story book like "God's Playground". It's not a history book either. Space Cadet 21:48, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Balcer, jakie nazwy uzywa Davies w Bozym Igrzysku, niema znaczenia. To nie jest nawet problem historyczny - w jezyku angielskim to miasto nazywa sie Gdansk. I tak na marginesie, nie dyskutujemy tutaj na temat nazwy miasta tylko administratora ktory nie trzyma sie regul wikipedii Witkacy

Spokojnie.Widzę że niemieckim nacjonalistom i germanofilom puszczają nerwy skoro uciekają się do de facto cenzury by zgermanizować polskie miasta i rejony na wiki.Ale spokojnie, można to cierpliwie i wytrwale powstrzymywać.Chrisa należy gdzieś ewidentnie zgłosić bo blokuje aby przeforsować swój punkt widzenia. --Molobo 15:33, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Kampania wrzesniowa, pierwszy raz zblokowal mnie trzeciego - prawie trafi na czas ;) --Witkacy 17:36, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Chris nie stosuje się do tego co nam poleca przestrzegać.On daje niemieckie nazwy a w rezultach(sfałszowanego) głosowania podano że trzeba podawać ANGIELSKIE nazwy.Tak więc powinno być Torun zamiast Toruń, Gdynia zaś jest używana w angielskim, podobnie jak Warmia. Tymczasem Chris uparcie próbuje wcisnąć niemieckie nazwy. Dla przykładu: Gdynia Poland-1,690,000 na Google. Gdingen Poland-14,7000 na Google.

Podobnie jest z Toruniem, Warmią itd. --Molobo 09:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Królewiec

Mam kłopoty na stronie Kaliningrad. A na stronie dyskusyjnej jakieś młoty odsądzają mnie od czci i wiary. Proszę o szybką pomoc. Dzięki! Kosmonauta

Chetnie pomoge, obecnie siedze za sprawa klausa w pawiaku, jutro mam chwilowa przepustke wiec zerkne.--Witkacy 21:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Pomylka, klaus zbanowal mnie na caly tydzien--Witkacy 13:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Przydałby się banner "Nur für Deutsche und Polizei in Uniformen" na wikipedi dla niektórych artykułów, żeby było wiadomo kto może edytować ;) --Molobo 01:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Antypolonizm odblokowany

Radzę zerknąc na stronę. --Molobo 09:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Pipes

There are some editors causing controversy at Daniel Pipes. Do you or any other Polish editors care about this? Daniel Pipes is Jewish, but a few editors want to make him seem only "Polish". I have no idea why. DannyZz 01:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Great work!

Love your Poland portal, stop by more often

[edit] Images

Hi, you uploaded Image:General Brygady P.gif and Image:General Brygady test.png, I'm guessing you drew them, but they lack source information- could you please add the copyright details to the image pages asap. Thanks. --nixie 07:11, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Władysław Krzysztof Grabiński

Presumably there is enough information about why Władysław Krzysztof Grabiński should be an aticle in Wikipedia, but there's nothing in the article to justify that. Being a Polish noble in the post-1921 era is not notable enough in my opinion to warrant an article, and there is nothing in the article to indicate why of the various people involved in the Warsaw Uprising, he was notable. Since you went to the effort to also add a picture to that article, I'm presuming that you have access to such information. However, if the article isn't improved soon, I'll be sending it to AfD. (If it weren't for that photo, I'd have already sent it there.)

[edit] Wincenty Frelichowski

Good morning i am a french reader of wiki and i found your contrbution about don Stephan Wincenty Frelichowski. Could you possibly send me some pictures of him and of polish scouting during and before the 2nd World War with good definition in order to share them with my scouts ?

palain@riaumont.net

thank you very much !! Père Alain HOCQUEMILLER

[edit] Image:Krzyzyk ZHP.jpg

What is this image's origin? Is it from a photograph you took? ¦ Reisio 18:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Lilijka zhr z napisem.gif

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lilijka zhr z napisem.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cohesion★talk 02:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Wawel XVIw.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wawel XVIw.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — THOR ^=/\= 04:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 06:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD

Hello Witkacy, I wanted to let you know that I nominated Elżbieta Marianna Wielopolska for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elżbieta Marianna Wielopolska), on grounds that she is not notable. If you disagree, I would appreciate your comments. (Also, I really like your painting on your main page.) --Fang Aili 19:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lwow pod zaglami 2.jpg

I've labeled this image as pd-old, but I don't understand polish, so I wasn't able to fully understand what was written on the pl page. could you double check that I've tagged it correctly? Thanks. Matt 04:39, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

ditto with Image:Lwow_w_Rio_de_Janeiro_600.jpg

both fixed. --Irpen 02:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Policja2.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Policja2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 08:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Wegorzewo Mapa.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Wegorzewo Mapa.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 01:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:StanislawOstrowski.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:StanislawOstrowski.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Carnildo or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you.

Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Jezioro goplo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jezioro goplo.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 00:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Marek Edelman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marek Edelman.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 13:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Pagon-starszy bosman.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Pagon-starszy bosman.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 09:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Pagon komandorpodporucznik m.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Pagon komandorpodporucznik m.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 09:41, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 06:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Stanislaw_Broniewski.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stanislaw_Broniewski.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 06:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Admiral-Floty P.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Admiral-Floty P.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 02:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Obrazy Witkacego

Obrazy Witkacego NIE SĄ JESZCZE własnością publiczną: autor umarł w 1939, dopiero w 2009 będzie można swobodnie kopiować i używać jego prace. A.J. 15:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 02:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Marynarka.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Marynarka.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. BRossow 18:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Same for the order images, like Image:Oak island large6.jpg. Thanks, JYolkowski // talk 20:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Order_Orla_Bialego2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Order_Orla_Bialego2.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 10:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Order_Orla_Bialego3jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Order_Orla_Bialego3jpg.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 03:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Karol_Czartoryski.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Karol_Czartoryski.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:POLMIL

Hi there! You might want to know that the good ol' Wikipedia:WikiProject Polish Army has been restarted, this time as WP:POLMIL, a part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. As the main tasks of the previous WikiProject have been fulfilled (both Polish-Bolshevik and Polish Defensive wars are now featured), we might want to start yet another quest for some holy grail. Any ideas? Halibutt 14:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ignacy Daszynski.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ignacy Daszynski.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 21:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Chrzanowski order orla bialego.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chrzanowski order orla bialego.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 18:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Irpen 21:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg

hello Witkacy, thank you for uploading the image, it has however no source information. Could you please provide it? thank you... Gryffindor 03:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Brazowy_Krzyz_Zaslugi_z_Mieczami_zdjecie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brazowy_Krzyz_Zaslugi_z_Mieczami_zdjecie.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 07:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

fixed. --Irpen 02:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Bronislaw_Duch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bronislaw_Duch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

fixed. --Irpen 02:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Dar_Mlodziezy_z_masztu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dar_Mlodziezy_z_masztu.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Found LQ image, but can't find the exact source.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Asnyk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Asnyk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Herb Glemp.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Herb Glemp.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 11:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed (fair use).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Adam_Daniel_Rotfeld.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Daniel_Rotfeld.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed (PolandGov).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 01:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Found LQ image, but can't find the exact source.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Gielda_siedziba.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Gielda_siedziba.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 01:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edmund Taczanowski

Hiya, could you please tell me where you got the Edmund Taczanowski image from? I'm one of his relatives, and would be very interested. Thanks! --Elonka 15:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ossolineum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ossolineum.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Krzysztof_Mikolaj_Radziwill.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Krzysztof_Mikolaj_Radziwill.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Skarzysko_kosciol_nsj.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Skarzysko_kosciol_nsj.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:47, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed (GFDL, Commons).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 20:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Polonia_Restituta.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Polonia_Restituta.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Restored fair use, still needs a source.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 20:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Michal_Grazynski.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Michal_Grazynski.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed - source found.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:58, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] one contributor

Czesc, Witkacy! Just wanted to point this out: Wikipedia contributor Kuban coSSack's talking about dictatorial ruler Lukashenka (who massively and monstrously falsified the vote) and today's storming of the October square, when hundreds of special police arrested peaceful demonstrators, totally destoryed the camp, threw empty vodka bottles into the mess and videotaped that for Belarusan state television. Here's Kuban coSSack's comment about this police action and break-up of a peaceful protest, which took place at 3AM so that there would be no witnesses of their activity:

• http://www.br23.net/en/2006/03/24/game-over/#comments
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rydel#.22kuban_coSSack.22

Dear fellow Wikipedians, do you understand that the only purpose of his contributions on articles about Belarus (such as Belarusian language, Belarusian history, Belarus, etc.) is to push Russian imperial POV and lies? Please, see history and talk pages of the Belarus-related articles. --rydel 16:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Robert_Korzeniowski.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert_Korzeniowski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed (PolandGov).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:KrzyzOswiecimski-rew.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KrzyzOswiecimski-rew.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 09:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Fixed (added tags from pl wiki).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 13:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Gryffindor 20:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 17:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Status

Have you see this box?

--evrik ^(talk) 19:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your template is listed for deletion

Yes, it's true. Try not to add them :). Wanna know why? :) We already have succesion boxes available. :) Happy Wiki-ing, friend!--陈鼎翔 贡献 Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Teodor Potocki.jpg

I saw that your insert the picture of Teodor Potocki in the english wiki. I´m from Ermland(warmia) and born in Allenstein(Olsztyn) and interested in information about this region. So my question did you have this picture in a higer resolution avaliable - if you have please send it to me (korczak.artur [at] gmx.de), I´m also avaliable in the german wiki under Akorczak.

Thanks Artur

Please read the notice at the top of the page. I'll repost it to the bottom too.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 15:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Orlik_Team.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Orlik_Team.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Sejm sala obrad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sejm sala obrad.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 04:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:KrzyzHR.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:KrzyzHR.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Order_Stanislawa2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Order_Stanislawa2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Apolonia Ustrzycka.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Apolonia Ustrzycka.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 16:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:OrzelekPrzemysla.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 16:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Parasolka n.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Parasolka n.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

This user is inactive since 08:34, 14 September 2005. This user is also not replying to emails. If you have any questions about this user, you might find help at Wikipedia talk:Polish Wikipedians' notice board. We also help with finding sources and licenses for the images!