Talk:Witch's milk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Vote to move

I'm voting to move this to neonatal milk and instead have Witch's milk redirect there. I believe the scientific term should take precidence. Objections? Please vote. Tyciol 19:56, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I have no objection, although the word is "precedence" ;-) When/if it gets moved, switch the order of the names in the article lead. Tomer^talk 05:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Conditionally Oppose until evidence is of "neo-natal" being correct is provided. The external link to the JAMA article uses the term "Witch's Milk" (albeit in scare quotes) and the other linked article uses other terms. AjaxSmack 08:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

• Merge with Galactorrhea, not enough for second article, keep redirects. Gene Nygaard 23:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

I was not aware of the term/condition Galactorrhea, I think it's a great idea to merge this into it, and redirect all different names to it. That helps bypass the controversy of what to name it entirely. Tyciol 01:29, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, you don't really need an admin to merge, do you? ;) —Nightstallion (?) 20:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

it's not true that this only occurs with full-term babies, my son was born five weeks early and had this condition