User talk:Wine-in-ark
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You can learn how to use Wikipedia by reading the policies. The administrators probably know more than me so how about asing them? And also, it would be less confusing when you leave the message on the bottom of my talk page, not the top. Han Amos 23:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
There are so many administrators here on Wikipedia. The few I know is User:Redvers, User:DragonflySixtyseven, User:Yamla, User:Pgk, and User:Ryulong. Many more can be found by clicking here. Han Amos 01:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
PS: Just to tell you that my name is really Amos Han, but I inverted my name when creating an account. Han Amos 01:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Re:References
Hi! Have you visited WP:CITE and WP:ATT? The latter page, especially, seems to apply to your case. I would recommend referencing a third party source (e.g. another public and well-known website, or books), instead of the interal web, as much as possible.
Welcome to Wikipedia and have a great day! Poor Yorick 06:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi again. Regarding anon sources and blog replies, that would be considered original research and thus unreliable. See WP:ATT#Reliable Sources and the categories of questionable and self-published sources; the anon / blog replies would probably go under both categories.
Again, if you can find a credible secondary source that has synthesized the primary source stuff, then you probably can cite that. Again, WP:ATT tells you what is credible and what isn't.
See also WP:AFAQ for further FAQ!
Cheers, Poor Yorick 09:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] vandalquiroz
Check out User:Rickquiroz's fun and games at Ouspensky and Gurdjieff.
Then can his ass. =)Yeago 20:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:AIV
When reporting a user, go to WP:AIV. Then click on the Edit button on the User-reported section. When reporting an IP address, put {{IPvandal|00.00.00.00}} (this is just an example). When reporting a username, put {{Vandal|Username}}. Leave me a message when you still don't get how to report a user. Han Amos 19:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Fellowship of Friends
An editor has nominated Fellowship of Friends, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fellowship of Friends and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Remember me?
I am the one who gave you advice on the Fellowship of Friends article. I am going to let you know that I am going to make my 1000th edit soon (this is my 998th edit). Amos Han Talk 02:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
