Talk:Williamsburg, Brooklyn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] rewrite? citations?
Why does this article have a tag for a "complete rewrite"? The article is very thorough and accurate. The complaints of a small handful people commenting here should not mean that the work of many gets scrapped. Please remove the "rewrite" tag, it's not called for.
Also, the music section has morre citations and sources than the rest of the article, why is it consistently tagged as "citation needed"?
- I agree. The editor who tagged it contributed the vague haiku at the bottom of this talk page by way of explanation and hasn't been heard from since. I'm pulling the tag. Sylvain1972 02:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Environmental Hazards
Rather than irrationally focus on the remote risk of a terrorist strike on Williamsburg (ganja getting you paranoid?), why not pay attention to legitimate environmental risks, which have 100% certainty of affecting residents? In the section about environmental hazards, there should be something about the various health problems associated with the unclean drinking water and polluted air in the neighborhood (from decades of industrial pollution, much of it in very close Greenpoint), including sky high asthma rates. The 20something hipsters never stay long enough to become aware of the widely publicized long-term health risks, even though they might suffer from them.
I don't have time to write it at the moment, but someone should. Aroundthewayboy 16:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Bueller? Bueller? Aroundthewayboy 19:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
This entry re. Environmental Hazards - Sounds more like an opinion that based on facts and research... Elhombre72 21:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Aroundthewayboy...if you feel so strongly it should be written, you should write it. Didn't have time on May 8, fine, but three months have passed. I'm especially interested in seeing your citations for unclean drinking water. Decafdyke 01:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] General
Shouldn't there be some sort of public warning about the killer school buses that roam the streets trying to run people down?
Wow. This article is so full of inacurracies I don't know where to begin.
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.
I removed the paragraph about the guy who produced the surrealist show because this could only have been put in there by him. I am an artist who has been in the area since 1992, and this little show had little to no impact on anyone or anything that I know of. the principle galleries in the area are: Momenta, Pirogi, Roebling hall.
i will come back here in a few days and prop up the art content. the bits about the bands and the roving parties are correct. other mentions should go to: L cafe read cafe Jeff Stark Hungry March Band Girdle Factory the G train activsm in the area etc
[edit] Vandalism Ahead
This is obviously one of the "old" crowd, foregotten in the mix of more important personages and venues, who thinks that Pierogi, Roebling Hall, etc., and his or her friends are still, if they ever were, important people in Williamsburg or the art world. This person has proceeded to vandalize the article and, by all indications, will be coming back to add his (her) friends and probably himself (herself) to the article and delete people he or she does not approve. We will wait and see.
Message for Terrance and WAH center folk. please do not use this space to promote your facility. i removed the material here that was mostly PR for WAH center. WAH center is a pretty cool place, but it is in NO WAY central or integral to williamsburg. it is one among *many* *many* diverse institutions, people, micro-communities, movements and other factors that helped to develop the area as an artist district.
why don't you start a page specifically for WAH center where more detailed information and links for your organization would be more fitting? it looked liked you just cut/pasted your mission statement here...blah*
in fact, i'm pretty sure that it is not advised for people to write about themselves at all on wikipedia.
[edit] Southside & Northside of Williamsburg
northside and southside are part of williamsburg. so if you live in either one, you live in williamsburg.
It never ceases to amaze me how quick "hipsters from around the nation" are to trash on other hipsters from around the nation who arrived five minutes later. Yes, the terms Southside and Northside are used by locals, but they refer to the south side and north side of what? Of Williamsburg, of course. Maybe the Town of Williamsburgh didn't include those areas in the 1650s, but by the 19h century and beyond the term certainly did. I guess somewhat forgot to tell the hipsters who put on the Giglio Feast of Our Lady of Mt Carmel every year that they don't live in Williamsburg, because based on their website they seem to think they do: http://www.giglio-usa.org/Brooklyn_Mt_Carmel.htm. Here's an article from an 1883 edition of the Brooklyn Eagle that places Northside and Southside in "Williamsburg": http://eagle.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/Repository/getFiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib:ArticleToMailGifMSIE&Type=text/html&Path=BEG/1883/12/16&ID=Ar00904&Locale=&ChunkNum=0 You can blame hipsters for many things, but calling Williamsburg "Williamsburg" is kosher ~GZ 10/2/05
[edit] About "Williamsburg"
maccarren park is in greenpoint. well, its kind of in between williamsburg and greenpoint but its mostly greenpoint.
I see some discussion about what to name it. My mother and father grew up there (my mother's father headed the St. Paulinus feast back in the 1930s) and they all called it "Williamsburg." When asked further, they would have said they lived on "the Northside" (my mom lived on Havemeyer and N 7th, my dad moved around, but usually lived on Graham Ave north of Metropolitian). Grand Street is the dividing line between the North and South Streets and traditionally marked the dividing line between the Italians (Northside) and the Jews and later Puerto Ricans ("Southside"). When I lived near MacCarren Park in the early 2000s, I said I lived in Williamsburg. --Amcalabrese 22:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Now, I don't have anything against LGBWilliamsburgBridge.jpg as a picture in and of itself. However, I do not feel that it is appropriate in this context. Yes, it was taken from the Williamsburg waterfront—but it doesn't say anything about Williamsburg itself! This image might be well-suited for the article about Manhattan or Downtown, or perhaps later in this article in other context, but not as the top-level image.
[edit] Rents
This article states average rents, but then doesn't explain whether they're per month, per week, per quarter etc. Can anyone provide some clarification?
those are all daily rates.--Ultranaut 05:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
How about info on the multii million dollar condos all over the place?
And the many new hasidic constuctions!
Yes, the impact of construction has had a positive impact on Brooklyn's economy and proves the "trickle down" theory works
Although I will be the first to admit that this is not the proper forum for an economic or political debate, What's your logic behind THAT one? This is not the place to make an out-of-context argument about the "trickle down" theory. I will simply say that I refute your use of the "trickle down" term in this case, it is a grossly innapropriate term for describing the development of the economic conditions that you are referencing. --Fossiltooth
[edit] Bands From Williamsburg
This article states that:
"Williamsburg and its scene has produced alternative and avant rock bands such as They Might Be Giants, the Yeah Yeah Yeahs, TV on the Radio (who featured an image of the Williamsburg Bridge approach on the inside of their debut EP, "Young Liars"), White Magic, Japanther, Oneida, Liars, Awesome Color, Parts and Labor, Diamond Nights, Sightings, Langhorne Slim, Vic Thrill, Wooden Wand and the Vanishing Voice, Ghost Exits, Matt & Kim, Will Hawkins, The Rapture, Pixeltan, Enon, Young People, Ex Models, Rogers Sisters, Double Leopards, Aa (aka Big A little a), Gang Gang Dance, SnapPusher, Les Savy Fav, BARR, Black Dice, Out Hud, !!! (aka "Chk Chk Chk"), and Animal Collective."
Now, as far as I know, They Might Be Giants are most definitely from Park Slope, not Williamsburg. As to the Yeah Yeah Yeahs, I was almost certain they variously from NYU, Oberlin, etc. I'm not sure about the rest of the bands, but considering that those two don't seem right to me, I'm inclined to believe that the rest of the bands that are listed - who are in fact of much interest to hipsters in Williamsburg - are not neccesarily based in Williamsburg.
Let's try to either reference these or remove them. --Pac 05:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Someone needs to make the music section it's own stub. It also needs to be seriously edited and researched (considering a majority of those bands are Manhattan based). edit: The page at least should have a disclaimer, but I don't know how that works. Anyone? Emilysix 22:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
They Might Be Giants are most definitely long-time Williamsburg residents. View Gigantic, the recent documentary on the band.
[edit] Pictures of Williamsburg
When I was in Brooklyn this summer I also took a few pictures of Williamsburg, I wanted to post these on the page, but I posted pictures before and I am required to have the copyright, but I took these pictures myself (how can I license them to say they are under my name before posting?)
Thank you --Bahador
[edit] East Williamsburg review
I'm asking people who are familiar with Williamsburg to come look at East Williamsburg, Brooklyn and review it. I created the article some time ago, primarily to distinguish that the area is concurrently associated with Bushwick, as well as Williamsburg. (It has since been edited primarily by another user.) Previously the article redirected to Bushwick. Those who are familiar with the Eastern District of Brooklyn will also know greatly about this area. Thanks. Tinlinkin 10:12, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
east williamsburg is the part near the grand street campus high schools.
[edit] Williamsburg, Brooklyn
The lead section is confusing and too short.
There should be a picture next to the lead section.
The History section needs to be restructured.
The Evnironmental Hazards section is biased and opinion based.
The Music Scene section is jumbled, and has too many long lists within paragraphs(band names, venues).
I think the Rent section should be cited, and probably updated.
The Rezoning section is biased/one-sided.
Grassroots Development section?
Emilysix 00:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think the rezoning section is rather balanced. Proponents say this, opponents say that. Can you be more specific? Sylvain1972 13:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] aefwtsdfhjtfwyu65
I can imagine a lot of families on the Northside of Williamsburg (the Italians, particularly) own their own homes, and I see that a lot of them are living lives of ridiculous prosperity. As in, they're making a killing off renting the above floors of their homes at the current Williamsburg market rate, and then they can sell their lots to delevopers for more money.
So, why only the mention of people being "pushed out", but not the prosperity of the home owners currently there? It's typical bourgeouis bohemian attitudes that focus on the "old neighborhood dying, maaan" by the "totally phoney hipsters" and not see that the old neighborhood includes actual home owners, since so many of the buildings in WBURG are suburban houses. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 140.212.213.41 (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC).
yes alot of homes are owned but alot of homes arent owned and the rent to people. and yes some of the people they rent to are the so called hipsters but some of them they rent to are to people that have been living here for a while. like myself. my rent is going up. and i cant afford for it to get any higher based on what i make for a living. alot of the people in this neighborhood do not make as much as the hipsters do because they probably never got a chance to go to college or to move up the social ladder. so before you say that some people are just profiting over this, there's always been people profiting. but the ones that think the rent in williamsburg is affordable compared to their salaries are being pushed out.
don't forget rising property value will also push out homeowners who don't can't afford to pay the taxes that go along with that. --Vsthesquares 17:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] External Links
I don't consider wiliamsboard.com a spam link under the policy on external links. On the contrary, it provides "meaningful, relevant content" for those interested in the neighborhood.Oldmark 20:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe not a spam link, but forums are considered links to be avoided, so unless there's an incredibly compelling reason, it shouldn't be there. Mosmof 08:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)