Talk:William Henry Keeler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was not moved. Jonathunder 23:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- William Henry Keeler → William Cardinal Keeler — Wiki style appears to accept this as the correct title on articles about Cardinals of the Catholic Church, See Cardinal (Catholicism) "Since 1630, cardinals have taken the style Eminence, and upon elevation the word "Cardinal" becomes part of the prelate's name, traditionally coming immediately before the surname." --Jdurbach 19:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Oppose Noel S McFerran 17:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - I believe common name is better.--Aldux 21:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support - "Cardinal" has been part of his name since he was made one. Personal preference is indifferent.--Tajm 13:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
- Put a link to the wiki page that backs this naming convention up. This may well be the the standard way of Cardinal naming, but it seems extremely counter-intuitive, ex: we don't say William Doctor Keeler, we say Doctor William Keeler. Rlevse 21:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Examples of Wiki articles named correctly include: James Cardinal Gibbons, Thomas Cardinal Wolsey and Avery Cardinal Dulles just to name three of many. See Category:American cardinals --Jdurbach 20:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.